Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VakO 27.1.1981/481:80 KI-generiert

Insurance court rules that pre-existing retinal detachment caused by a traffic accident is compensable under Finnish insurance law.

Geschäftsnummer VakO 27.1.1981/481:80
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Finnish Insurance Court ruled that the insured's subsequent retinal detachment was a compensable consequence of a prior traffic accident. Although the insured had a pre-existing hereditary condition and underwent surgery for cataracts, the court found the accident directly caused the detachment. The court held that the pre-existing condition did not exempt the insurer from liability for the accident-induced deterioration.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Insurance Act 1911, Section 10; Section 10 of the Insurance Act 1911 establishes that an insurer must pay for damages resulting from an insured event even if the insured had a pre-existing condition, provided the event was the direct cause of the specific damage.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
pre-existing condition retinal detachment traffic accident insurance liability causation analysis Finnish insurance law compensable damage unbewiesener Kausalzusammenhang

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Insurance Act 1911, Section 10
KI-generiert
insurance_1982_7755-1981
Work injury claim dismissed as 20% of shoulder tear was pre-existing age-related degeneration.
kko-other_1996_320
Workplace injury claim dismissed as employee's own negligence caused the accident.
kko-precedent_1989_154
Supreme Court allows partial accident compensation when pre-existing eye disease significantly reduced injury severity.
kko-other_2011_2942
Supreme Court dismisses claim that shoulder rotator cuff and biceps tendon rupture caused a traffic accident.
kko-other_2007_483
Supreme Court dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove accidental tear of filter membrane caused by trauma.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Työntekijä, joka poti perinnöllistä silmien lasiais-verkkokalvorappeumaa ja jolle oli tehty harmaakaihin vuoksi silmäleikkaus, oli liukastunut ja lyönyt otsansa katuun. Seuraavana päivänä hänellä oli todettu vasemman silmän verkkokalvon irtauma. VAKO epäsi korvauksen silmien lasiais-verkkokalvorappeumasta ja verkkokalvon irtaumasta. VII -jaosto KKO 7.2.1983: Vasemman silmän verkkokalvon irtauman oli katsottava aiheutuneen mainitusta tapaturmasta ja määrättiin korvattavaksi. (Lääkintöhallitus: Oksala