Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VakO 17.11.1981/191:81 KI-generiert

Diabetes-induced osteomyelitis from a work injury is compensable as a direct consequence of the accident.

Geschäftsnummer VakO 17.11.1981/191:81
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Insurance Court ruled that the claimant's osteomyelitis, caused by a work-related puncture wound in a diabetic foot, is compensable. The insurer denied benefits, arguing the diabetes was a pre-existing condition unrelated to the injury. The court held that the infection and subsequent bone inflammation were direct medical consequences of the accident, not the underlying disease.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Vakuutusoikeuslaki 191/1981; 10 §: The development of an infection and subsequent osteomyelitis in a diabetic patient following a work-related wound is considered a direct consequence of the accident and thus compensable.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
diabetes mellitus osteomyelitis work injury infection consequence compensation claim pre-existing condition medical causation wetterbedingter Arbeitsausfall

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Vakuutusoikeuslaki 191/1981
KI-generiert
insurance_2003_8350-2002
Insurance court denied compensation for diabetic foot infection caused by minor injury, ruling medical causation required.
insurance_1979_766-1979
Court allows occupational disease compensation for repetitive lifting injuries under Finnish Act on Occupational Diseases.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2022:65
Supreme Court allows occupational disease compensation for asthma caused by mold exposure at workplace.
kko-other_2008_439
Supreme Court dismissed claim for work injury compensation due to lack of causal link between pre-existing conditions and accident.
insurance_1978_5861-1977
Insurance court denied disability benefits for shoulder inflammation caused by repetitive phone button pressing.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Työntekijä, joka poti sokeritautia, oli työssä astunut naulaan saaden pistohaavan oikeaan jalkaterään. Haava oli tulehtunut ja siihen oli muodostunut märkäpesäke. Sittemmin oli todettu oikean jalan luissa luuydintulehdus. VAKO epäsi korvauksen sokeritaudista ja luuydintulehduksesta. IV -jaosto KKO 12.10.1983: Jalan luuydintulehdus oli korvattava puoleksi tapaturman seurauksena. (Lääkintöhallitus: Larmi)