Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VakO 1.7.1981/1765:80 KI-generiert

Insurance court denied claim that criminal compensation exceeds civil damages when refusing tort claims.

Geschäftsnummer VakO 1.7.1981/1765:80
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's request to refuse a tort-based compensation claim on the grounds that the criminal defendant owed greater civil damages. The applicant argued that the existence of a larger criminal compensation should bar the tort claim, but the court found no legal basis for such a defense. Consequently, the court ruled that the insurance authority has no right to deny the tort claim based on the amount of criminal compensation awarded.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Tapaturmavirastolaki 1981; 10 §: The insurance court lacks the authority to refuse a tort-based compensation claim by invoking that the criminal defendant is liable for greater civil damages to the victim.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
insurance court authority tort compensation claim criminal compensation defense civil damages excess refusal of claim Kostendeckungsprinzip ausstehende Lizenzgebühren behinderungsbedingte Kosten

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Tapaturmavirastolaki 1981
KI-generiert
insurance_1982_4093-1981
Insurance court ruled theft compensation must be reduced if caused by a state-compensable offender.
kko-precedent_1987_66
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; driver loses claim against insurer and must pay litigation costs per Traffic Insurance Act.
kko-precedent_2013_52
Supreme Court allows compensation for unlawful detention under ECHR Art 5.5 despite domestic law requiring one day duration.
kko-precedent_1988_128
Supreme Court dismisses claim against state for official error damages when first instance court lacks jurisdiction.
insurance_1983_2088-1982
Insurance court dismissed claim where insured failed to prove loss occurred within statutory limitation period.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Tapaturmavirastolla ei ole oikeutta kieltäytyä suorittamasta pahoinpitelyyn perustuvaa vahingonkorvausta siihen vedoten, että rikoksentekijällä on tuomion nojalla vahingonkorvausta suurempi yksityisoikeudellinen saatava vahingoittuneelta. IV-jaosto