Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VakO 14.2.1979/414:78 KI-generiert

Insurance court dismissed claim against insurer when insured was sole owner of farm under will.

Geschäftsnummer VakO 14.2.1979/414:78
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The insurance court dismissed the applicant's claim against the insurer, ruling that the insured was not liable as an 'insured person' under the MYEL policy. The farm had passed to the widow via will, and the sons residing on the farm did not claim their statutory share. Consequently, the widow remained the sole owner and manager, excluding the sons from the definition of insured persons required for coverage.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

s. 10.1.1. MYEL; The insurer is not liable for losses occurring on a farm when the insured is the sole owner and manager, and other family members residing there have not claimed their statutory share of ownership.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
farm ownership will inheritance MYEL policy insured person definition family share claim sole management insurance liability Elternrente

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
s. 10.1.1. MYEL
KI-generiert
insurance_1984_5226-1982
Insurance court dismissed sister's claim for work income allowance due to brother's prior approval of land area.
insurance_1981_11909-1979
Insurance court dismissed disability pension claim for commercial orchard work as it falls under YEL, not MYEL.
insurance_1982_5298-1981
Insurance court ordered pension board to review late wife's claim after husband sought its removal.
insurance_1983_4254-1982
Insurance court dismissed invalidation request for disability pension where insured continued acting as farm manager post-transfer.
insurance_2008_4771-2006
Insurance court dismissed request to annul unemployment benefit decision due to lack of grounds for annulment.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kun maatila oli testamentin nojalla jäänyt emännän omistukseen ja hallintaan eivätkä tilalla asuvat pojat olleet vaatineet lakiosaansa, poikia ei tullut vakuuttaa MYEL:n mukaisesti isäntinä. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin. I -jaosto