Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VakO 6.10.1971/754:71 KI-generiert

Contractor performing turnkey summer cottage work was not in an employment relationship with the client.

Geschäftsnummer VakO 6.10.1971/754:71
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Insurance Court upheld the Pensions Board's decision that the contractor performing turnkey summer cottage work was not in an employment relationship with the client. The court found that the contractor operated independently and therefore the rules governing employees under the Employment Liability Act did not apply. Consequently, the claim for employee benefits was dismissed as the legal relationship was one of independent contracting.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Vakuutusoikeus 6.10.1971/754:71; The contractor performing turnkey summer cottage work was not in an employment relationship with the client, and the rules of the Employment Liability Act were not applicable.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
turnkey construction contract employment relationship independent contractor status summer cottage project employment liability act Zumutbarkeit ergänzende Vertragsauslegung Unlautere Geschäftspraktiken

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
LEL
KI-generiert
insurance_1991_6081-1990
Insurance court ruled a puppet theater visitor agreement constituted an indefinite-term employment relationship subject to TEL.
insurance_1981_2694-1979
Insurance court ruled that renovation work is construction under LEL Act, not TEL Act, allowing claim.
labour_2010_60
Labor court dismissed union claim that subcontractor violated collective agreement by using workers under its supervision.
labour_1979_165
Labor court dismisses strike claim where workers intended hourly pay but agreed to terminate contract and switch to hourly work.
market_2005_102
Market Court dismisses bid rejection claim where tenderer failed to prove tax compliance despite valid tender. The court ruled the procurement authority acted fairly by excluding the non-compliant bidder. The decision upholds the exclusion based on lack of proper tax documentation. The court found no discriminatory treatment against the successful tenderer. The ruling confirms the authority's right to exclude bidders with unresolved tax debts. The decision emphasizes equal treatment in public procurement procedures. The court rejected the claim for compensation due to procedural compliance.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kesämökin "avaimet käteen" -periaatteella urakoinut henkilö ei ollut työsuhteessa rakennuttajaan eikä häneen ollut sovellettava LEL:n säännöksiä. Eläkelautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. III -jaosto