Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Helsingin HO 16.06.1986 587 KI-generiert

Bank's security interest and tenant's priority right to payment under EOA Section 5 are incompatible.

Geschäftsnummer Helsingin HO 16.06.1986 587
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court dismissed the tenant's claim to a priority right under EOA Section 5 because the bank held a security interest based on the tenant's payment guarantee. The tenant argued for priority rights, but the court found the bank's security interest took precedence. Consequently, the statutory priority right could not be established against the bank's secured claim.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

EOA 5 §; EOA 10 §: A security interest granted to a bank based on a tenant's payment guarantee precludes the tenant from claiming a priority right to payment under EOA Section 5.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
security interest priority right payment guarantee bank claim tenant obligation incompatible rights security transfer Bankenrecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
EOA 5 §
Vuokranmaksun suorittamisesta antamansa takauksen perusteella vuokran maksaneelle pankille oli tuon saatavan ohella siirtynyt vuokranantajalle kuulunut EOA 5 §:ssä tarkoitettu etuoikeus maksun saantiin.
EOA 10 §
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1994_109
Supreme Court allows claim against guarantor for damages exceeding original rent due to early lease termination.
kko-other_1997_1799
Supreme Court held that a loan repayment made by a bank manager in depression is not a valid discharge of debt.
appeal_1976_turku__315
Guarantor's right of recourse against principal debtor exists regardless of whether guarantor repaid the loan.
kko-precedent_1991_58
Guarantor bound to pay only what guarantor was legally obligated, not payments made to third parties.
kko-precedent_1995_144
Supreme Court allows bank claim against borrower for debt arising from a fraudulent loan scheme. The court held that the bank's knowledge of the fraud made the claim not contrary to good faith.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Vuokranmaksun suorittamisesta antamansa takauksen perusteella vuokran maksaneelle pankille oli tuon saatavan ohella siirtynyt vuokranantajalle kuulunut EOA 5 §:ssä tarkoitettu etuoikeus maksun saantiin.

Läsnä: Surakka, Tornivuori ja Martimo Esittelijä: Kivalo

Lainvoimainen