Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
BS-10480/2024-HER ECLI:DK:HER:2025:BS0000001230 KI-generiert

Court dismisses appeal on remittal to District Court as case lacks general legal significance.

Geschäftsnummer BS-10480/2024-HER
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Dänemark (DK)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, ordering the case to be remitted to the District Court for first-instance trial. The District Court had found the case to be of principled character and of general significance for the application and development of the law. Consequently, the Court of Appeal declined to act as a court of first instance, adhering to the principle that such cases must be tried by a lower court.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Retplejelovens § 226, stk. 1; A case of general significance for the application and development of the law must be tried by a court of first instance, and the Court of Appeal will not act as such.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
remittal to first instance general legal significance principled character Court of Appeal jurisdiction civil procedure law Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung Hauptsache Hauptmiete

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Retplejelovens § 226, stk. 1
KI-generiert
BS-47808/2020-KBH
District Court refers group action to High Court due to principle of liability for advisory opinions.
BS-23871/2024-HRS
Court dismisses appeal regarding transfer of case to district court under Section 226 of the Act on Civil Procedure.
BS-2453/2009-VLR
Appeal dismissed; case remitted to lower court for interpretation of law of general principle.
BS-33645/2020-OLR
Court dismisses appeal against district court refusal to refer case to first instance due to lack of general legal significance.
BS-2496/2013-VLR
Civil case remitted to district court for preliminary assessment of whether it is of general legal principle. The court found the case not suitable for immediate ruling. The decision was based on the need for further factual clarification. The court remitted the case to the lower court for a preliminary assessment of whether the matter is of general legal principle. The court determined that the case requires further factual clarification before a final decision can be made. The court decided to remit the case to the district court for a preliminary assessment of whether the matter is of general legal principle. The court found that the case is not yet suitable for a final ruling. The court decided to remit the case to the district court for a preliminary assessment of whether the matter is of general legal principle. The court determined that the case requires further factual clarification before a final decision can be made. The court decided to remit the case to the district court for a preliminary assessment of whether the matter is of general legal principle. The court found that the case is not yet suitable for a final ruling.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kendelse om henvisning af sag til landsretten til behandling som 1. instans, jf. retsplejelovens § 226, stk. 1, da byretten finder, at sagen er af principiel karakter, og at den har generel betydning for retsanvendelsen og retsudviklingen

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.