SS-14996/2021-GLO ECLI:DK:GLO:2024:SS0000001032 KI-generiert

Detention conditions regarding risk of influencing proceedings were not met, leading to dismissal of the application.

Geschäftsnummer SS-14996/2021-GLO

Gericht / Behörde Retten i Glostrup

Rechtsordnung

Dänemark (DK)

Entscheiddatum 2023-10-25

Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court dismissed the application questioning whether pre-trial detention conditions regarding the risk of influencing proceedings were fulfilled. The applicant argued that specific risks necessitated continued detention, while the opposing party contended that the threshold for such conditions was not met based on available evidence. The court decided against the applicant because the presented facts failed to demonstrate a sufficient risk of influencing the ongoing proceedings to justify the detention measures.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Straffesagens varetægtsfængsling; Risikoen for påvirkning af forfølgningen: Det kræves en konkret og væsentlig risiko for, at varetægtsfængslingen vil påvirke forfølgningen, for at betingelsen for fortsat fængsling kan opfyldes.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert

pre-trial detention conditions risk of influencing proceedings criminal procedure law detention justification procedural safeguards Bedingungen der Untersuchungshaft Sucharrest Status als Geheimdienstmitarbeiter

KI-generiert

SS-3071/2023-OLR

Appeal dismissed; detention conditions regarding interference risk with prosecution not met.

SS-681/2008-VIB

Court denies bail for suspect in serious crime case due to flight risk and public safety concerns.

SS-356/2008-ESB

Detention continued under s. 769 Ls. dismissed because conditions for continued detention were not met.

SS-2570/2009-VLR

Court orders continued pre-trial detention for defendant pending final judgment on criminal charges.

SS-2116/2008-NAE

Court dismisses appeal regarding police letter and visit control legality after pre-trial detention. Police argued necessity for security; court found no violation. Appeal dismissed due to lack of procedural error.