Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
AS-456/2012-HBK ECLI:DK:HBK:2024:AS0000000010 KI-generiert

Court dismisses enforcement of registered pre-emptive right against forced auction due to lack of proper notice and procedural defects.

Geschäftsnummer AS-456/2012-HBK
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Dänemark (DK)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court dismissed the applicant's request to enforce a registered pre-emptive right against a forced auction of the property. The applicant argued that the right was validly registered and should have been notified, while the opposing party contended that procedural requirements for such notifications were not met. The court ruled that without proof of proper notice and adherence to statutory procedures, the pre-emptive right could not be enforced in this specific auction scenario.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Sections 10 and 11 of the Act on Forced Auctions; A registered pre-emptive right is not enforceable against a forced auction if the statutory requirements for notice and procedural compliance are not satisfied.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
pre-emptive right forced auction procedural notice registration validity enforcement dismissal öffentliche Versteigerung öffentliches Übernahmeangebot Rückkaufswert

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Act on Forced Auctions, Section 10
Act on Forced Auctions, Section 11
KI-generiert
BS-1091/2013-OLR
Court upholds auction buyer's duty to respect pre-emptive right servitude despite sale price claims.
AS-291/2015-HBK
Court orders auction buyer to pay overdue property tax as part of the maximum bid amount.
BS-742/2013-OLR
Court dismisses joint auction request for two creditors due to separate creditor status and procedural rules.
BS-871/2020-OLR
Court allows foreclosure auction of building and leasehold rights subject to association rules.
BS-3315/2010-ARH
Court dismisses referral request, holding auction court lacks jurisdiction over civil proceedings regarding property disputes.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Sag om, hvorvidt og i givet fald under hvilke omstændigheder en tinglyst forkøbsret kan gøres gældende i forbindelse med en tvangsauktion

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (11 sider) Dommer

Matr. nr. 1 Adresse 1 By 1 Ejer 1

Liebhaver 1

Matr. nr. 2 Adresse 1 By 1 Liebhaver 1 Adresse 1 By 1

Liebhaver 1 Adresse 2 Adresse 3 By 1 Matr. nr. 2 m.fl.

Gård Adresse 4 Liebhaver 1

Ejer 1 Adresse 5 Liebhaver 1

Adresse 1 By 1 Matr. nr. 1 Ejer 1

Matr. nr. 1 Gård Matr. nr. 2 m.fl.

Gård Matr. nr. 1

Matr. nr. 2 Ejer 1

Matr. nr. 2 m.fl. Ejer 1 Adresse 1

Ejer 1 Ejer 1

Ejer 1

Ejer 1

Liebhaver 1

Adresse 1 By 1

Matr. nr. 2 m.fl.

Matr. nr. 1 Adresse 1 By 1 Liebhaver 1

Liebhaver 1 Gård Matr. nr. 1 Liebhaver 1

Liebhaver 1 Liebhaver 1

Liebhaver 1 Liebhaver 1

Gård Matr. nr. 2 m.fl.

Ejer 1

Ejer 1

Liebhaver 1 Matr. nr. 2 m. fl. Adresse 3 Matr. nr. 1 Adresse 1

Matr. nr. 1 Matr. nr. 1 Gård Liebhaver 1

Liebhaver 1

Liebhaver 1

Liebhaver 1 Matr. nr. 2 m. fl.

Adresse 1 By 1

Liebhaver 1

Dommer