Court dismisses appeal where prior judgment lacks real effect and cannot be treated as final in duplicate cases.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant's request to set aside the lower court's decision regarding the validity of a prior judgment. The appellant argued that a previous ruling by the Randers Court should have real legal effect in two separate citation cases involving the same parties. The court held that because the prior judgment could not be substantively examined and was not given effect, it lacked the necessary legal force to bind the current proceedings. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as the prerequisite for treating the earlier decision as final was not met.