Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
BS-42428/2022-KBH ECLI:DK:KBH:2024:BS0000000964 KI-generiert

Paternity claim dismissed due to procedural delay; genetic father's request rejected for exceeding three-year limit.

Geschäftsnummer BS-42428/2022-KBH
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Dänemark (DK)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court dismissed the application to reinstate the paternity case, noting that a full reassessment would likely yield a different outcome. The genetic father's independent request for reinstatement was rejected because it was filed after the child turned three years old. Consequently, the court declined to reopen the proceedings, adhering to the strict temporal limits for such applications.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Paternity Act; Genetic Evidence Act: A request to reinstate a paternity case is inadmissible if filed after the child has reached the age of three, as the likelihood of a different outcome renders the procedural remedy ineffective.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
paternity claim reinstatement procedure genetic evidence age of three procedural deadline family law court discretion verspätetes Fristerstreckungsgesuch

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Paternity Act
Genetic Evidence Act
KI-generiert
BS-331/2009-SON
Court dismisses father's appeal as Child Custody Act conditions for reopening the case were not met.
BS-2759/2008-OLR
High Court allows late appeal for paternity case due to exceptional circumstances preventing timely filing.
BS-1281/2009-VLR
Court dismisses father's appeal to restart paternity suit, remanding for further investigation into another man's paternity.
BS-3121/2009-OLR
Court dismisses fatherhood case resumption due to lack of error under Child Act s. 23.
BS-524/2011-VLR
Court dismisses appeal to reinstate paternity case, upholding lower court's decision on procedural grounds.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Sag om faderskab skulle genoptages efter en samlet vurdering af sagens omstændigheder, og da det nu måtte forventes, at faderskabssagen ville få et andet udfald, hvis den blev genoptaget. Samtidig afvistes genetisk faders selvstændige anmodning om genoptagelse, idet anmodningen ikke er fremsat inden barnet var 3 år

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.