Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
BS-2119/2006-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2024:BS0000000863 KI-generiert

New filing after first dismissal rejected as exceeding the statutory time limit for initiating proceedings.

Geschäftsnummer BS-2119/2006-VLR
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Dänemark (DK)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court dismissed the plaintiff's request to initiate new proceedings following a prior rejection. The plaintiff argued that the delay was justified by unforeseen circumstances, while the opposing party contended the filing strictly violated the procedural deadline. The court ruled that the statutory time limit is mandatory and cannot be extended without specific statutory grounds, leading to the dismissal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Retplejeloven § 253, stk. 1 og 2; The statutory time limit for initiating civil proceedings is a mandatory requirement that cannot be extended by the parties or the court absent specific statutory exceptions.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
procedural time limit initiation of proceedings statutory deadline first instance dismissal civil procedure law Verfahrensfristen verspätetes Fristerstreckungsgesuch Revisionsfrist

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Retplejeloven § 253, stk. 1 og 2
KI-generiert
BS-260/2007-HJR
Supreme Court allows new lawsuit filing after dismissal by extending the statute of limitations period.
BS-1322/2010-OLR
Appeal court overturns dismissal of small claims case due to non-attendance at a permitted telephone hearing.
BS-1504/2014-VLR
Court dismissed appeal as bankruptcy filing deadline under Section 81 of the Bankruptcy Act was not met.
BS-1577/2007-OLR
Appeal dismissed for non-appearance; failure to appear at hearing triggers automatic dismissal under procedural law.
BS-327/2007-HJR
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on procedural grounds, rejecting new arguments after residence permit granted.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Sag om, hvorvidt sagsanlæggelse på ny, efter landsrettens første afvisningsbeslutning, overholder søgsmålsfristen, jf. retsplejelovens § 253, stk. 1 og 2