Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
BS-1410/2006-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2022:BS0000000326 KI-generiert

Court dismisses appeal to reopen child custody case due to lack of new evidence and procedural bar.

Geschäftsnummer BS-1410/2006-OLR
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Dänemark (DK)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court dismissed the appellant's request to reopen the child custody proceedings from 2006. The appellant argued that new circumstances regarding the child's well-being had arisen since the original judgment, while the respondent maintained the finality of the decision. The court ruled that no new facts justified reopening the case under the relevant procedural rules.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Sektion 600 af Forældremyndighedsloven; Sektion 601 af Forældremyndighedsloven: A final custody judgment cannot be reopened unless new facts or circumstances arise that were not available at the time of the original decision.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
child custody appeal reopening proceedings finality of judgment new evidence requirement family law procedure Erneute Prüfung des Vorgangs Wiedererwägung veraltetes medizinisches Gutachten

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Sektion 600 af Forældremyndighedsloven
Sektion 601 af Forældremyndighedsloven
KI-generiert
BS-331/2009-SON
Court dismisses father's appeal as Child Custody Act conditions for reopening the case were not met.
BS-1336/2011-VLR
Court allows appeal against Process Permission Board's refusal of free process due to new income data.
BS-1092/2010-OLR
Appeal against dismissal for missing phone meeting without legal cause; court finds no valid reason for dismissal.
BS-653/2020-OLR
Appeal court dismisses request to reopen case due to lack of legal basis for correcting procedural error.
BS-3507/2014-OLR
Land court allows claim by lifting old statute of limitations decision due to timely interruption request.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Sag om, hvorvidt sagsbehandlingen af den respektive sag kan tages op igen

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (10 sider) Part 1 (Sagsøger)

Part 2 (Sagsøger)

Part 1

Part 2

Part 1 Part 2 Part 2

Person 1

Person 1

Barn 1 Dato 1

Barn 1 Person 2

Barn 1 Barn 1

Dato 1 Part 2

Part 2

Skole 1 Skole 2

Part 1

Barn 1 Dato 1

Part 1

Part 1

Part 1 Part 1 Part 2

Barn 1 Barn 1

Part 1

Barn 1 Person 2 Person 2 Part 2´s

Part 1

Part 2´s

Part 1 Part 2 Part 1 Part 2