Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
BS-2091/2009-VLR ECLI:DK:VLR:2023:BS0000006219 KI-generiert

Court dismisses appeal for low-value case lacking Process Permission Board approval under Section 389.

Geschäftsnummer BS-2091/2009-VLR
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Dänemark (DK)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Justice dismissed the appeal because the lower court set costs below the 10,000 kr. threshold, requiring Process Permission Board approval which was absent. The appellant argued for review of the cost assessment, but the court noted that appeals for such low amounts are procedurally barred without specific permission. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as inadmissible due to the missing statutory authorization.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 389, paragraph 2 of the Rules of Civil Procedure; Section 389, paragraph 2 of the Rules of Civil Procedure: Appeals against judgments setting costs below 10,000 kr. require explicit permission from the Process Permission Board, and without such permission, the appeal is inadmissible.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
costs below threshold Process Permission Board admissibility requirement civil procedure rules low value appeal Verfahrenskosten Streitwertgrenze Rechtsvorschlag

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 389, paragraph 2 of the Rules of Civil Procedure
retsplejelovens § 389, st.
KI-generiert
BS-7042/2024-VLR
Appeal dismissed because leave from the Procedure Permission Board was required under the Rules of Civil Procedure but not obtained.
BS-557/2011-OLR
Appeal against refusal to accept late complaint under tax law section 64 is dismissed as inadmissible.
BS-397/2011-OLR
Appeal court upholds lower court's decision to reopen a small claims case after default judgment. The court confirms the general right to request case reopening under the Code of Civil Procedure. The decision clarifies that small claims rules do not exclude the general reopening provision. The court notes the defendant requested reopening within the statutory time limit. The appeal court affirms the lower court's ruling on reopening the proceedings.
BS-701/2011-OLR
Court upholds lower court ruling allowing name change after corporate merger under company law provisions.
BS-33238/2024-HJR
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for 6,000 DKK costs ruling without Process Permission Board approval under Section 584a.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Landsretten afviser kæremål, da byretten ved afgørelsen af sag har fastsat sagsomkostninger til et beløb, der ikke overstiger 10.000 kr., og afgørelsen derfor kun kan kæres med tilladelse fra Procesbevillingsnævnet, jf. retsplejelovens § 389, st. 2., og sådan tilladelse foreligger ikke