Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
BS-377/2021-OLR ECLI:DK:OLR:2023:BS0000003233 KI-generiert

Court holds that applying credit agreement law section 42 precludes subsequent application of section 41.

Geschäftsnummer BS-377/2021-OLR
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Dänemark (DK)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court upheld the lower court's decision that applying section 42 of the Credit Agreement Act bars the later application of section 41. The plaintiff argued for the applicability of section 41, while the defendant relied on the exclusivity of section 42. The court ruled that the specific provision in section 42 effectively excludes the general provision in section 41 from further application in this context.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Credit Agreement Act section 42, paragraph 2; Credit Agreement Act section 41: The specific provision in section 42, paragraph 2, precludes the subsequent application of the general provision in section 41.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Credit Agreement Act statutory interpretation provision exclusivity legal hierarchy preclusive effect Verwirkung des Rückgriffsrechts Retentionsrecht Rückwirkungsverbot

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Credit Agreement Act section 42, paragraph 2
Landsretten stadfæstede fogedrettens kendelse, om, at anvendelse af kreditaftalelovens § 42, stk.
Credit Agreement Act section 41
2, afskærer efterfølgende anvendelse af kreditaftalelovens § 41
KI-generiert
BS-4036/2012-OLR
Court dismisses claim for costs where debtors delay caused fee expiration under Retsafgiftsloven § 19.2.
BS-319/2023-OLR
Court of Appeal overturns lower court ruling and remands case for further proceedings regarding asylum claim.
BS-1401/2003-VLR
Court dismisses appeal confirming lower court's decision to reject a claim for attorney fees due to non-service of documents.
BS-367/2008-HJR
High Court dismisses appeal; creditors with mortgages on shares have no right to be summoned for property auction.
BS-2214/2008-OLR
Enforcement of private settlement without debtor's signature dismissed due to lack of legal basis.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Landsretten stadfæstede fogedrettens kendelse, om, at anvendelse af kreditaftalelovens § 42, stk. 2, afskærer efterfølgende anvendelse af kreditaftalelovens § 41

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i kæremålet til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.