Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
FS-3887/2020-FRB ECLI:DK:FRB:2023:FS0000000016 KI-generiert

Credit agreement law § 42(2) bars subsequent application of § 41 after a specific notice is given.

Geschäftsnummer FS-3887/2020-FRB
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Dänemark (DK)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court ruled that the application of Credit Agreement Law § 42(2) precludes the later use of § 41. The plaintiff argued for the application of § 41, while the defendant relied on the exclusionary effect of § 42(2). The court held that once § 42(2) applies, § 41 cannot be invoked subsequently.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Credit Agreement Law § 42, stk. 2; § 41, stk. 1: The application of § 42(2) excludes the subsequent application of § 41.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Credit Agreement Law statutory exclusion subsequent application legal bar procedural consequence Kreditauftrag bestrittene Forderung Krediteröffnungsvertrag

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Credit Agreement Law § 42, stk. 2
Credit Agreement Law § 41, stk. 1
KI-generiert
BS-1449/1994-VLR
Court dismisses debt obligation defense based on alleged forgery due to appellant's gross negligence.
BS-28/2010-KOL
Court dismisses claim as statute of limitations expired following Vestre Landsret precedent. Claimant failed to prove service of notice on defendant.
BS-1607/2008-HBK
Court orders disclosure of credit assessments to prove debtor's insolvency knowledge for voidable transaction reversal.
BS-74/2019-VLR
Court allows claim to proceed after finding statute of limitations interrupted by 2009 assignment request.
FS-2590/2019-SVE
Limitation interrupted only for the specific amount claimed in the prior enforcement request under Danish law.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Anvendelse af kreditaftalelovens § 42, stk. 2, afskærer efterfølgende anvendelse af kreditaftalelovens § 41

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider) Orientering fra Domsdatabasen: Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i kæremålet til denne sag. Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende afgørelser. De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i Domsdatabasen.