Appeal dismissed; security for costs required to resume proceedings against defendant.

The Court of Appeal upheld the District Court's decision to dismiss the appeal, ordering the appellant to provide security for costs to resume proceedings. The appellant sought to restart litigation against the defendant, arguing the original judgment was flawed, while the defendant insisted on financial security before any resumption. The court rejected the appeal because the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient assets or creditworthiness to cover potential costs, necessitating the security requirement.