Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
BS-33557/2023-HOL ECLI:DK:HOL:2026:BS0000000208 KI-generiert

Court dismisses claim against accounting firm for negligence in advising company continuation, ruling statute of limitations expired.

Geschäftsnummer BS-33557/2023-HOL
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Dänemark (DK)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim against the accounting firm for alleged negligence in advising the company's continuation. The plaintiff argued the firm failed to warn of insolvency risks, while the firm contended the claim was time-barred. The court ruled that the claim was inadmissible because the statutory limitation period had expired before the lawsuit was filed.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

s. 157, stk. 1, af Gældsbrevsloven; s. 159, stk. 1, af Gældsbrevsloven: A claim for damages based on professional negligence is barred if the statutory limitation period expires before the lawsuit is initiated.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
statute of limitations accounting firm liability negligence claim commercial advice insolvency warning Entschädigung des Beistands Konkursverwalterentschädigung Konkursaufschub

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
s. 157, stk. 1, af Gældsbrevsloven
s. 159, stk. 1, af Gældsbrevsloven
KI-generiert
BS-32481/2019-OLR
Land court allows trade union to act as representative in director's bankruptcy probation case under procedural law.
BS-403/2017-NAE
Court dismisses bankruptcy quarantine claim against director due to lack of gross misconduct.
BS-2483/2009-KBH
Court allows recovery of insolvent company debt from guarantors via bankruptcy reversal under Danish law.
BS-42/2017-HOL
Court orders three company directors to serve three-year bankruptcy quarantine for gross misconduct.
BS-23728/2020-SON
Court orders three-year bankruptcy quarantine for sole proprietor due to grossly negligent business conduct.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Sag om revisionsfirmas ansvar i forbindelse med rådgivning om fortsættelse af drift i selskab, spørgsmål om forældelse

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.