Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
SS-2440/2025-KBH ECLI:DK:KBH:2026:SS0000000133 KI-generiert

Seizure of car deemed disproportionate; confiscation order upheld despite claim of unproportionate interference.

Geschäftsnummer SS-2440/2025-KBH
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Dänemark (DK)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court upheld the seizure order, rejecting the applicant's claim that confiscating the vehicle constituted disproportionate interference. The applicant argued the measure was excessive, but the court found no evidence that the seizure was unproportionate given the circumstances. Consequently, the decision to maintain the seizure was confirmed as legally sound.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Straffelovens § 76; Straffelovens § 77: The seizure of a vehicle is not considered disproportionate interference if the circumstances justify the measure and the applicant fails to prove otherwise.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
disproportionate interference seizure of vehicle confiscation order criminal procedure proportionality principle Geschwindigkeitsbusse gefährliches Überholen Raserdelikt

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Straffelovens § 76
Straffelovens § 77
KI-generiert
SS-1970/2021-VLR
Court upholds police seizure of car where leaseholder faces significant financial risk from tenant's inability to pay.
SS-1157/2021-SVEef
Court allows police seizure of car where owner could not foresee son's illegal street racing.
SS-1702/2021-OLR
Confiscation of third-party vehicle upheld where owner could not foresee its use for racing.
SS-598/2013-HIL
Court orders confiscation of car despite defendant's financial hardship and need for transport.
SS-1365/2013-ALB
Court approves police seizure of truck as suspect is sole owner and previously convicted of driving while suspended.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Sag om, hvorvidt beslaglæggelse af bil skal ophæves, fordi det må antages at være uforholdsmæssigt indgribende at konfiskere bilen

[DOKUMENT] Afgørelse (1 sider)

Orientering fra Domsdatabasen:

Højesteret har afsagt kendelse i et kæremål til denne sag.

Højesterets kendelse kan læses uden forudgående læsning af underliggende

afgørelser.

De underliggende afgørelser i kæremålet er af den årsag ikke offentliggjort i

Domsdatabasen.