Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
Costas Hji Costas v. The Republic (1965) JSC 1075 KI-generiert

Court refused witness recall application due to lack of proper timing and sufficient support under section 25(3).

Geschäftsnummer Costas Hji Costas v. The Republic (1965) JSC 1075
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Zypern (CY)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court refused the appellant's application to recall prosecution witness P.W.3, ruling that such requests must be properly made in due time and sufficiently supported. Counsel argued the case was serious and required more time, but the court declined to reserve judgment sine die. Consequently, the application was dismissed, and the criminal appeal was adjourned for a final decision on November 18, 1965.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 25(3) of the Courts of Justice Law, 1960; An application to recall a prosecution witness must be properly made in due time and sufficiently supported to be entertained.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
witness recall application prosecution witness due time requirement sufficient support standard criminal procedure law court of justice law adjournment for judgment Anspruch auf einen Entscheid

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
section 25(3) of the Courts of Justice Law, 1960
Criminal Procedure - Application to recall witness under section 25(3) of the Courts of Justice Law, 1960 (Law 14 of 1960), must be properly made, in due time, and be sufficiently supported.

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
Kousoulides v. The Republic (Criminal Appeal 2444)
Pitsillos v. The Police (Criminal Appeal 2457)
Pericles Ioannou Kolias v. The Police (Criminal Appeal 2637)
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

[*1075] 1965 October 15

(VASSILIADES, TRIANTAFYLLIDES, MUNIR, JJ.)

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Costas Hji Costas,

Appellant,

v.

The Republic,

Respondent.

(Criminal Appeal No.2780).

Criminal Procedure - Application to recall witness under section 25(3) of the Courts of Justice Law, 1960 (Law 14 of 1960), must be properly made, in due time, and be sufficiently supported.

G. Tornaritis, for the Appellant.

S. Georghiades, Counsel of the Republic, for the Respondent.

In the course of the hearing of the above criminal appeal, Appellant’s

Counsel made an application to recall a witness of the Prosecution (P.W.3), under the provisions of section 25(3) of

the Courts of Justice Law, 1960.

The decision of the Court on the said application was delivered by:-

VASSILIADES. J.: Dealing first with Mr. Tornaritis application to have witness 3 recalled for further examination, under the provisions of section 25(3) of the Courts of Justice Law, 1960, we have to repeat what has already been pointed out more than once before: that such an application will only be entertained if properly made, in due course, and if sufficiently supported, as directed in Kousoulides v. The Republic (Criminal Appeal 2444, decided on 16.4.62)*; in Pitsillos v. The Police (Criminal Appeal 2457, unreported); Pericles Ioannou [*1076] Kolias v. The Police (Criminal Appeal 2637, decided on 4.6.63);* and in several other cases decided thereafter, to which we need not now refer. The application to recall witness Ritsa Georghiou (P.W,3) is, therefore, refused.

As regards the merits of the appeal, we are inclined to agree with counsel for the appellant that this is a most serious case for his client, and we would like to have more time to consider our judgment. We wish to avoid reserving judgment sine die in a criminal appeal; unfortunately, we have no day available before the 1 8th November. The case will be adjourned to the 18th November, for judgment. The appellant is under his sentence-warrant.

Application to recall

witness under section 25(3)

of the Courts of Justice

Law, 1960, refused.

Case adjourned to the

18th November, 1965, for

judgment.

* Not yet reported.

* Not yet reported.