Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
90.2000.58 • TRPI TI 90.2000.58 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Appeal Against Cantonal Planning Zone Establishment

Geschäftsnummer 90.2000.58
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party filed an appeal against a State Council decision that established a cantonal planning zone to safeguard studies related to priority projects outlined in the regional planning for several municipalities. The court noted that during the hearing, the appellant, through their representative, withdrew the appeal. Consequently, the court concluded that the proceedings were exhausted and decreed the appeal stricken from the record, with no fees or costs levied.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 108 cpv. 2 LTF, Art. 66 cpv. 1 LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal Against Cantonal Planning Zone Establishment: The court noted that during the hearing, the appellant, through their representative, withdrew the appeal. Consequently, the court concluded that the proceedings were exhausted and decreed the appeal stricken from the record, with no fees or costs levied.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Planungskosten Nichteinzonung Parteianhörung Zone mit Planungspflicht Legitimation gegen Baubewilligung Bebauungsplan Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 108 cpv. 2 LTF
Implied, as the court noted the case was concluded by withdrawal and did not impose costs or fees.
Art. 66 cpv. 1 LTF
Cited implicitly by the decision not to levy fees or costs.
KI-generiert
90.2000.49
Cantonal Planning Zone Appeal Struck After Withdrawal
90.1997.59
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Cantonal Regulatory Plan
90.2002.134
Appeal Withdrawal in Swiss Planning Zone Dispute

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 108 cpv. 2 LTF

Implied, as the court noted the case was concluded by withdrawal and did not impose costs or fees.

Art. 66 cpv. 1 LTF

Cited implicitly by the decision not to levy fees or costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 90.2000.58 · Lugano 10 gennaio 2005 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio Raffaello Balerna

assistito dal segretario: · Leopoldo Crivelli

statuendo sul ricorso 25 settembre 2000 della

RI 1 patr. da: RA 1 contro

la decisione 27 giugno 2000 (n. 2771) con cui il Consiglio di Stato ha adottato una zona di pianificazione cantonale a salvaguardia degli studi relativi alla progettazione delle opere prioritarie previste nella pianificazione comprensoriale del __________ e concernente i comuni di __________, __________, __________, __________ e __________;

preso atto che in sede d'udienza 17 novembre 2004 la ricorrente, per il tramite del proprio patrocinatore, ha ritirato il ricorso;

considerato pertanto che il procedimento è così esaurito;

decreta:

1. Il ricorso è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano né tasse, né spese.

3. Intimazione a:

terzi implicati · PI 1 rappr. da: RA 3 CO 1 rappr. da: RA 2 Il presidente del Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio · Il segretario