Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
90.1999.2 • TRPI TI 90.1999.2 KI-generiert

Appeal Inadmissibility and Costs Order

Geschäftsnummer 90.1999.2
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Planning Tribunal considered an appeal filed on December 30, 1999, by a specific appellant against an unspecified decision, although the judgment ultimately declares the appeal inadmissible and orders the appellant to pay court fees and expenses. The reasoning for declaring the appeal inadmissible is not detailed in the provided excerpt, which focuses only on the final disposition, including the notification of the judgment to the local municipality, the State Council, and the urban planning section.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Inadmissibility and Costs Order: The reasoning for declaring the appeal inadmissible is not detailed in the provided excerpt, which focuses only on the final disposition, including the notification of the judgment to the local municipality, the State Council, and the urban planning section.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Eröffnung des Entscheids Planungskosten Beschwerdelegitimation Zahlungsbefehl Urteilsvorschlag Anfechtung von Verwaltungsverfügungen Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
2.

This order imposes the payment of court fees and expenses on the appellant.

1.

This order rules on the outcome of the appeal (which is declared [omitted text]).

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 90.99.00002 · Lugano IN_DATA_DECISIONE · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 30 dicembre 1999 di

CE __________ __________ a avv. __________ __________, __________, contro

Per questi motivi,

visti gli art.

dichiara e pronuncia

1. Il ricorso é .

2. Il ricorrente é condannato al pagamento delle tasse di giudizio e delle spese per complessivi fr. .

3. Intimazione: -

- Municipio di

- Consiglio di Stato, ___________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, ___________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario