Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
90.1998.117 • TRPI TI 90.1998.117 KI-generiert

Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Beyond Statutory Thirty-Day Deadline

Geschäftsnummer 90.1998.117
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court dismissed an appeal filed on June 18, 1998, against a resolution intimated on April 6, 1998, because it was filed outside the statutory thirty-day deadline applicable to appeals against State Council decisions under Article 38 paragraph 1 of the relevant law (LALPT), noting that the appellant mistakenly believed the deadline was sixty days and that the judicial recess period did not suspend this specific deadline sufficiently to make the filing timely.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 38 cpv. 1 LALPT, Art. 13 LPamm, Non specificato; Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Beyond Statutory Thirty-Day Deadline: The court dismissed an appeal filed on June 18, 1998, against a resolution intimated on April 6, 1998, because it was filed outside the statutory thirty-day deadline applicable to appeals against State Council decisions under Article 38 paragraph 1 of the relevant law (LALPT), noting that the appellant mistakenly believed the deadline was sixty days and that the judicial recess period did not suspend this specific deadline sufficiently to make the filing timely.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
verspätete Einreichung gesetzliche Frist verspätete Kündigung Verspätungsausschluss Unterbrechung der Verjährung Prozessrecht Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 38 cpv. 1 LALPT
This article establishes the thirty-day deadline for filing an appeal against decisions of the State Council, which was the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible due to being time-barred.
Art. 13 LPamm
This article regarding the suspension of deadlines due to judicial holidays was cited in the reasoning leading up to the procedural decision on inadmissibility.
Non specificato
The costs were imposed by order 2, but the specific article governing costs (e.g., Art. 66 LTF or equivalent cantonal norm) is not explicitly cited in that order.
KI-generiert
38.2018.71
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Due to Missed Deadline
30.2004.10
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing
14.2015.79
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing
16.2011.12
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing
17.2004.52
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 38 cpv. 1 LALPT

This article establishes the thirty-day deadline for filing an appeal against decisions of the State Council, which was the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible due to being time-barred.

art. 13 LPamm

This article regarding the suspension of deadlines due to judicial holidays was cited in the reasoning leading up to the procedural decision on inadmissibility.

Non specificato

The costs were imposed by order 2, but the specific article governing costs (e.g., Art. 66 LTF or equivalent cantonal norm) is not explicitly cited in that order.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 90.98.00117 · Lugano 7 luglio 1998 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

visto il ricorso del 18 giugno 1998 di

__________ __________ __________ __________ __________, __________ __________, rappr. da: __________ __________ -__________, __________ __________ __________, contro

__________

ritenuto

in fatto e in diritto

che la contestata risoluzione è stata intimata alla ricorrente in data 6.4.98.

che a norma dell’art. 38 cpv. 1 LALPT contro le decisioni del Consiglio di Stato è dato ricorso al Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio entro trenta giorni dalla notificazione (e non 60 come erroneamente ritiene la ricorrente);

che questo termine è sospeso dalle ferie giudiziarie (7 giorni prima e dopo Pasqua giusta l’art. 13 LPamm);

che il ricorso, interposto il 18 giugno 1998 è largamente fuori termine e quindi irricevibile;

Per questi motivi,

dichiara e pronuncia

1. Il ricorso, tardivo, è irricevibile.

2. La ricorrente é condannata al pagamento delle tasse di giudizio di fr. 100.-

3. Intimazione: - __________ __________, __________ __________

- Municipio di ____________________

- Consiglio di Stato, __________

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, __________

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario