Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
90.1997.18 • TRPI TI 90.1997.18 KI-generiert

Territorial Planning Tribunal Appeal Admissibility Ruling

Geschäftsnummer 90.1997.18
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party filed an appeal on March 26, 1997, challenging a resolution issued by an administrative body, with the Territorial Planning Tribunal ultimately declaring the appeal inadmissible and ordering the appellant to pay judicial fees and costs.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

art. 1, art. 2; Territorial Planning Tribunal Appeal Admissibility Ruling: A party filed an appeal on March 26, 1997, challenging a resolution issued by an administrative body, with the Territorial Planning Tribunal ultimately declaring the appeal inadmissible and ordering the appellant to pay judicial fees and costs.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Planungskosten Verwaltungsgebühren Zahlungsbefehl Bestimmung der örtlichen Zuständigkeit Bodenrecht Beschwerdelegitimation Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
art. 1
This provision is cited as the basis for declaring the outcome of the appeal in order 1.
art. 2
This provision is cited as the basis for ordering the appellant to pay court fees and costs in order 2.
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 1

This provision is cited as the basis for declaring the outcome of the appeal in order 1.

art. 2

This provision is cited as the basis for ordering the appellant to pay court fees and costs in order 2.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 90.97.00018 · Lugano IN_DATA_DECISIONE · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca

vicecancelliere · Tito Ponti

visto il ricorso del 26 marzo 1997 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione

Per questi motivi,

visti gli art.

dichiara e pronuncia

1. Il ricorso é .

2. Il ricorrente é condannato al pagamento delle tasse di giudizio e delle spese per complessivi fr. .

3. Intimazione: -

- Municipio di __________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario