Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
90.1996.17 • TRPI TI 90.1996.17 KI-generiert

Appeal Withdrawal Following Master Plan Challenge

Geschäftsnummer 90.1996.17
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party filed an appeal on March 4, 1996, challenging the State Council's resolution approving a new Master Plan for a municipality. However, subsequent to the filing and the submission of observations by the State Council and the Municipality, the appellant formally withdrew the challenge by a letter dated October 21, 1996, leading the court to conclude that the matter was moot and therefore strike the appeal from the rolls without imposing any fees or costs.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Withdrawal Following Master Plan Challenge: However, subsequent to the filing and the submission of observations by the State Council and the Municipality, the appellant formally withdrew the challenge by a letter dated October 21, 1996, leading the court to conclude that the matter was moot and therefore strike the appeal from the rolls without imposing any fees or costs.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Rückzug des Gesuchs verspätete Einwendungen Plangenehmigung Legitimation gegen Baubewilligung Überprüfung einer früheren Entscheidung definitive Rechtsöffnung Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
KI-generiert
90.1998.156
Appeal Withdrawal and Mootness of Master Plan Challenge
90.1997.29
Appeal Withdrawal Regarding Municipal Master Plan Supplement
90.2001.22
Municipality Master Plan Appeal Withdrawal
90.1995.66
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Master Plan Approval
90.1998.29
Appeal Withdrawal Renders Municipal Master Plan Challenge Moot

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
2.

The court ordered that no fees or costs shall be levied, applying a procedural decision regarding costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 90.96.00017 · Lugano 24 ottobre 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 4 marzo 1996 di

__________ __________ SA, __________, contro

la risoluzione __________ ottobre 1995 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva il Piano Regolatore di __________;

viste le osservazioni 2 maggio 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 23 aprile 1996 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 21 ottobre 1996 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario