Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
90.1995.167 • TRPI TI 90.1995.167 KI-generiert

Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Dispute

Geschäftsnummer 90.1995.167
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party filed an appeal on December 28, 1995, challenging the State Council's resolution of November 1995, which approved the zoning plan for a municipality. The court ruled on the matter after considering responses from the State Council and the municipality, and noting that at a hearing on September 12, 1996, the appellant declared the withdrawal of the appeal, leading the court to conclude that the case had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the record without assessing fees or costs.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 cpv. 2 LOC; Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Dispute: The court ruled on the matter after considering responses from the State Council and the municipality, and noting that at a hearing on September 12, 1996, the appellant declared the withdrawal of the appeal, leading the court to conclude that the case had become moot and ordered the appeal to be struck from the record without assessing fees or costs.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Nutzungsplan Streitgegenstand Parteianhörung Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens Wegnahmerecht verspätete Einwendungen Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 cpv. 2 LOC
This provision is inferred as the basis for the decision not to charge fees and costs when the case becomes moot due to withdrawal.
KI-generiert
90.1997.5
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Case
90.1994.249
Appeal Withdrawal Rendering Zoning Dispute Moot
90.1995.28
Mootness of Zoning Appeal Upon Withdrawal
90.1994.1
Appeal Withdrawal in Zoning Dispute
90.1996.112
Withdrawal of Zoning Appeal Renders Case Moot

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 cpv. 2 LOC

This provision is inferred as the basis for the decision not to charge fees and costs when the case becomes moot due to withdrawal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 90.95.00167 · Lugano 13 settembre 1996 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 28 dicembre 1995 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione del Consiglio di Stato nr. __________del __________novembre 1995 che approva il Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 21 marzo 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 15 maggio 1996 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che all’udienza del 12 settembre 1996 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________

- Municipio di _________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario