Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
90.1994.168 • TRPI TI 90.1994.168 KI-generiert

Appeal Withdrawal Leading to Mootness Finding

Geschäftsnummer 90.1994.168
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party filed an appeal against the resolution approving a municipality's land-use plan, but subsequently informed the court by letter that they were withdrawing the challenge. The court determined that because the appellant had withdrawn the matter, the case was rendered moot. Consequently, the appeal was removed from the docket, and no court fees or expenses were assessed.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Withdrawal Leading to Mootness Finding: The court determined that because the appellant had withdrawn the matter, the case was rendered moot. Consequently, the appeal was removed from the docket, and no court fees or expenses were assessed.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens anfechtbarer Zwischenentscheid verwaltungsrechtlicher Widerruf prozessuale Einreden Wegnahmerecht Überprüfung einer früheren Entscheidung Sentenza o decisione senza scheda
KI-generiert
90.2001.25
Withdrawal of Appeal Rendered Case Moot
90.1997.5
Appeal Withdrawal Due to Mootness in Zoning Case
90.1996.67
Appeal Dismissed as Moot Due to Withdrawal of Intent
90.1996.112
Withdrawal of Zoning Appeal Renders Case Moot
90.1999.76
Appeal Withdrawn Due to Mootness After Factual Clarification

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
2.

This procedural order dictates that no fees or costs shall be levied following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 90.94.00168 · Lugano 8 aprile 1998 · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio composto dai giudici: · Efrem Beretta, presidente, Giovanna Roggero-Will, Michele Rusca Il segretario · Fiorenzo Gianinazzi

statuendo sul ricorso del 3 agosto 1992 di

__________ __________, __________, contro

la risoluzione 1. luglio 1992 nr. __________del Consiglio di Stato che approva il Piano Regolatore del Comune di __________;

viste le osservazioni 24 aprile 1996 del Consiglio di Stato e 11 settembre 1992 del Comune di __________;

letti ed esaminati gli atti;

visto che con lettera 6 aprile 1998 la ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare l’impugnativa;

rilevato che la causa é divenuta priva d’oggetto;

decreta

1. Il ricorso é stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse e spese.

3. Intimazione a: · - __________ __________, __________

- Municipio di ________

- Consiglio di Stato, Bellinzona

- Sezione pianificazione urbanistica, Bellinzona

Tribunale della pianificazione del territorio

Il presidente Il segretario