Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.2006.49 • TRAC TI 15.2006.49 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Bankruptcy Declaration Rendered Moot by Debt Satisfaction

Geschäftsnummer 15.2006.49
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party filed an appeal challenging a bankruptcy declaration issued during enforcement proceedings initiated by a creditor. The court noted that the enforcing officer confirmed the appellant had paid the full amount sought in the execution, thereby extinguishing the debt and rendering the underlying execution (and thus the appeal against the resulting bankruptcy threat) moot under the relevant execution law. Consequently, the court struck the appeal from the record as it had become without object, ordered no court fees or indemnities to be charged, and established the ten-day period for any further appeal to the Federal Tribunal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 12 LEF, Art. 24b cpv. 1 LPR, Art. 19 LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF, art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF; Appeal Against Bankruptcy Declaration Rendered Moot by Debt Satisfaction: The court noted that the enforcing officer confirmed the appellant had paid the full amount sought in the execution, thereby extinguishing the debt and rendering the underlying execution (and thus the appeal against the resulting bankruptcy threat) moot under the relevant execution law. Consequently, the court struck the appeal from the record as it had become without object, ordered no court fees or indemnities to be charged, and established the ten-day period for any further appeal to the Federal Tribunal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Konkursverfahren Rechtsvorschlag Zulassung der Zwangsvollstreckung Schuldtilgungserklärung Beschwerdelegitimation Widerruf der Konkurseröffnung Stralcio per intervenuto pagamento del debito posto in esecuzione.

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 12 LEF
atteso che l¿esecuzione risulta pertanto estinta (art. 12 LEF);
Art. 24b cpv. 1 LPR
This provision was cited in the reasoning section to justify why the appeal procedure became obsolete and had to be struck from the record in order 1.
Art. 19 LEF
This provision is cited in order 3 to specify the appeal route available against the current decision.
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF
This provision established that no judicial fees are to be levied, as mentioned in order 2.
art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF
This provision established that no indemnities are to be awarded, as mentioned in order 2.
KI-generiert
14.2022.60
Appeal Against Bankruptcy Declaration Due to Subsequent Debt Satisfaction
14.2003.79
Appeal Against Bankruptcy Declaration Granted Upon Proof of Debt Satisfaction
15.1999.208
Mootness of Appeal Following Satisfaction of Debt
14.2014.145
Debtor Successful Appeal Against Bankruptcy Declaration Due to Satisfied Debt
14.2009.22
Appeal of Bankruptcy Judgment Granted Due to Debt Satisfaction and Solvency

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 24b cpv. 1 LPR

This provision was cited in the reasoning section to justify why the appeal procedure became obsolete and had to be struck from the record in order 1.

art. 19 LEF

This provision is cited in order 3 to specify the appeal route available against the current decision.

art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF

This provision established that no judicial fees are to be levied, as mentioned in order 2.

art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

This provision established that no indemnities are to be awarded, as mentioned in order 2.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.2006.49 · Lugano 29 maggio 2006 CJ/sc/fb · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Chiesa, presidente, Pellegrini e Walser

segretario: · Jaques

statuendo sul ricorso 30 marzo 2006 di

RI 1 contro

l¿operato dell¿CO 1, e meglio contro la comminatoria di fallimento emessa nell¿esecuzione n° __________ promossa contro la ricorrente da

PI 1

preso atto che l¿CO 1, con scritto 23 maggio 2006, ha comunicato che la ricorrente aveva proceduto al pagamento dell¿importo posto in esecuzione;

atteso che l¿esecuzione risulta pertanto estinta (art. 12 LEF);

considerato come la procedura ricorsuale sia così divenuta priva d¿oggetto e debba di conseguenza essere stralciata dai ruoli (art. 24b cpv. 1 LPR);

ricordato che non si preleva la tassa di giustizia e non si assegnano indennità (art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF);

richiamati gli art. 17, 20a LEF; 24b cpv. 1 LPR; art. 61 e 62 OTLEF;

pronuncia:

1. Il ricorso 30 marzo 2006 di RI 1, __________, è stralciato dai ruoli in quanto divenuto privo di oggetto.

2. Non si prelevano spese e non si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale a Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d¿appello, in conformità dell¿art. 19 LEF.

4. Intimazione a:

¿ RI 1, __________;

¿ PI 1, __________.

Comunicazione all¿CO 1.

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d¿appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente Il segretario