Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.2004.111 • TRAC TI 15.2004.111 KI-generiert

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal in Attachment Proceedings

Geschäftsnummer 15.2004.111
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellate court, acting as the supervisory authority, addressed an appeal filed against a notice of attachment issued in enforcement proceedings initiated by a creditor against the appellant. The court found that because the appellant officially withdrew the appeal via a letter dated July 19, 2004, the dispute was concluded, requiring the appeal to be struck from the rolls according to relevant procedural law, with no judicial fees or compensation awarded in accordance with fiscal regulations.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 24c LPR, Art. 19 LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF, art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF; Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal in Attachment Proceedings: The court found that because the appellant officially withdrew the appeal via a letter dated July 19, 2004, the dispute was concluded, requiring the appeal to be struck from the rolls according to relevant procedural law, with no judicial fees or compensation awarded in accordance with fiscal regulations.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Arrestverfahren Vollstreckungsverfahren Aufsichtsgebühren Prozessrecht formelle Verfahrenseinstellung Verstrickungsbruch Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 24c LPR
This article is cited in order 1 as the basis for striking the appeal from the rolls due to withdrawal (desistenza).
Art. 19 LEF
This article is cited in order 3 as the basis for the deadline and procedure for appealing to the Federal Supreme Court.
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF
This article is cited in order 2 as justification for not collecting court fees (tassa di giustizia).
art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF
This article is cited in order 2 as justification for not awarding compensation (indennità).
KI-generiert
15.2000.29
Withdrawal of Appeal in Enforcement Proceeding
15.2002.68
Supervisory Authority Strikes Appeal Due to Withdrawal
15.1999.30
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal in Enforcement Proceedings
15.2012.123
Claimant's Withdrawal of Appeal Against Attachment Record
15.2002.24
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal in Enforcement Proceeding

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 24c LPR

This article is cited in order 1 as the basis for striking the appeal from the rolls due to withdrawal (desistenza).

art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF

This article is cited in order 2 as justification for not collecting court fees (tassa di giustizia).

art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

This article is cited in order 2 as justification for not awarding compensation (indennità).

art. 19 LEF

This article is cited in order 3 as the basis for the deadline and procedure for appealing to the Federal Supreme Court.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.2004.111 · Lugano 6 agosto 2004 B/fp/dp · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

Composta dei giudici: · Pellegrini, vicepresidente, Chiesa e Walser

segretaria: · Baur Martinelli, vicecancelliera

statuendo sul ricorso 14 maggio 2004 di

RICO1 contro

l’operato dell’__________ __________ e meglio contro l'avviso di pignoramento 11 maggio 2004 emesso nell'esecuzione n. __________ promossa contro la ricorrente da

PINT1

preso atto che con scritto 19 luglio 2004 la RICO1 ha ritirato il ricorso;

considerato come la desistenza del ricorrente pone fine alla controversia e comporta

lo stralcio del ricorso dai ruoli (art. 24c LPR);

rilevato che non si preleva la tassa di giustizia e non si assegnano indennità

(art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF);

richiamati gli art. 17, 20a LEF; 24c LPR; art. 61 e 62 OTLEF;

pronuncia: 1. Il ricorso 14 maggio 2004 della RICO1, __________, è stralciato dai ruoli per desistenza.

2. Non si preleva la tassa di giustizia e non si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale a Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello, in conformità dell'art. 19 LEF.

4. Intimazione:

- RICO1, __________

- PINT1, __________

Comunicazione __________

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il vicepresidente La segretaria