Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.2002.120 • TRAC TI 15.2002.120 KI-generiert

Disciplinary Proceeding Against Terminated Enforcement Officer Moot

Geschäftsnummer 15.2002.120
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A disciplinary proceeding initiated against an enforcement officer, following the termination of their employment effective June 30, 2003, was struck from the docket because the officer was no longer subject to the relevant statutory provision that applies exclusively to enforcement organs currently in office. The court reasoned that since the individual was no longer actively serving in the capacity to which the disciplinary authority attached, the proceeding became moot and could not proceed for disciplinary action.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 14 cpv. 2 LEF, art. 61 OTLEF, art. 62 OTLEF; Disciplinary Proceeding Against Terminated Enforcement Officer Moot: The court reasoned that since the individual was no longer actively serving in the capacity to which the disciplinary authority attached, the proceeding became moot and could not proceed for disciplinary action.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Disziplinarstrafe Beendigung des Arbeitsverhältnisses Vollstreckung Verfahrenssistierung Verfahrensfehler Einstellung des Verfahrens Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 14 cpv. 2 LEF
Cited as the provision under which the disciplinary proceeding was initiated and whose scope determined the outcome of the case (the subject is no longer subject to it).
art. 61 OTLEF
Cited in relation to the decision to dismiss the proceedings.
art. 62 OTLEF
Cited in relation to the decision to dismiss the proceedings.
KI-generiert
15.2003.61
Dismissal of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Former Enforcement Officer Due to Termination of Employment
15.2001.279
Official Retirement Renders Disciplinary Action Moot
15.1997.190
Appeal Moot Due to Enforcement Withdrawal
15.1996.00044
Enforcement Appeal Mootness Due to Withdrawal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 14 cpv. 2 LEF

Cited as the provision under which the disciplinary proceeding was initiated and whose scope determined the outcome of the case (the subject is no longer subject to it).

art. 61 OTLEF

Cited in relation to the decision to dismiss the proceedings.

art. 62 OTLEF

Cited in relation to the decision to dismiss the proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.2002.120 · Lugano 16 luglio 2003/PF/fc/fb · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Cometta, presidente, Chiesa e Giani

segretario: · Cassina

statuendo nel procedimento disciplinare ex art 14 cpv.

2 LEF 12 settembre 2002 promosso nei confronti di

__________ patr. dall’avv. __________

preso atto che con decisione 4 giugno 2003 il __________ ha disdetto il rapporto di impiego di __________ con effetto al 30 giugno 2003;

rilevato che nei confronti di __________, non essendo più sottoposto all’art. 14 cpv. 2 LEF, applicabile unicamente agli organi d'esecuzione forzata in carica (cfr. Frank Emmel, Basler Kommentar zum SchKG, Basilea/Ginevra/Monaco 1998 n. 7 ad art. 14), non può essere presa alcuna misura disciplinare;

che di conseguenza il procedimento disciplinare in esame va stralciato dai ruoli, poiché

divenuto privo di oggetto;

richiamati gli art. 14 cpv. 2 LEF, art. 61 e 62 OTLEF

pronuncia: 1. Ilprocedimento disciplinare 12 settembre 2002 promosso nei confronti di __________, è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano tasse né si assegnano indennità.

3. Intimazione a:

– __________

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente Il segretario