Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.2001.300 • TRAC TI 15.2001.300 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Delayed Service of Executive Summons Struck as Moot

Geschäftsnummer 15.2001.300
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party filed an appeal alleging undue delay in the service of an executive summons related to an enforcement proceeding. The supervising authority determined that the enforcement office subsequently managed to serve the executive summons on the debtor via police notification, rendering the initial complaint about delayed service moot. Consequently, the court ruled the appeal deprived of its object and struck it from the roll, ordering no costs or compensation to be awarded.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 19 LEF, art. 17 cpv. 3 LEF, art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF, art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF; Appeal Against Delayed Service of Executive Summons Struck as Moot: The supervising authority determined that the enforcement office subsequently managed to serve the executive summons on the debtor via police notification, rendering the initial complaint about delayed service moot. Consequently, the court ruled the appeal deprived of its object and struck it from the roll, ordering no costs or compensation to be awarded.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vorladung Zulassung der Zwangsvollstreckung Rechtsverzögerung Eröffnung des Entscheids nachträglicher Rechtsvorschlag Beschwerdelegitimation Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 19 LEF
This article governs the recourse against the present decision in Order 3.
art. 17 cpv. 3 LEF
This provision, along with others, is cited in the context of the decision which ultimately strikes the appeal from the record (Order 1).
art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF
This provision, along with others, is cited in the context of the decision which ultimately strikes the appeal from the record (Order 1).
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF
This procedural provision is cited in relation to the merits/procedure of the decision to strike the appeal from the record (Order 1).
art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF
This procedural provision is cited in relation to the merits/procedure of the decision to strike the appeal from the record (Order 1).
KI-generiert
15.2015.36
Appeal Against Execution Office for Delayed Service of Executive Decree
15.1997.24
Appeal Regarding Execution Delay Dismissed as Moot Following Payment
15.1996.00098
Appeal Moot Due to Post-Filing Completion of Delayed Acts
15.2001.230
Appeal Regarding Delayed Ruling on Property Claim Dismissed as Moot

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 17 cpv. 3 LEF

This provision, along with others, is cited in the context of the decision which ultimately strikes the appeal from the record (Order 1).

art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF

This provision, along with others, is cited in the context of the decision which ultimately strikes the appeal from the record (Order 1).

art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF

This procedural provision is cited in relation to the merits/procedure of the decision to strike the appeal from the record (Order 1).

art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

This procedural provision is cited in relation to the merits/procedure of the decision to strike the appeal from the record (Order 1).

art. 19 LEF

This article governs the recourse against the present decision in Order 3.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.2001.00300 · Lugano 26 febbraio 2002/ EC/fc/rgc · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Pellegrini, vicepresidente Rusca e Chiesa

segretario: · Cassina, vicecancelliere

statuendo sul ricorso per ritardata giustizia del 20 novembre 2001 di

__________ contro

__________ nell’esecuzione n. __________ promossa dalla ricorrente nei confronti di

e meglio contro la mancata tempestiva notifica del precetto esecutivo all’escusso;

preso atto che nel frattempo l’UEF di __________ è riuscito a notificare a mezzo polizia il precetto esecutivo al debitore;

ritenuto pertanto che l’atto ritardato è stato compiuto, il ricorso

16 novembre 2001 di __________ è da ritenere privo di oggetto e va stralciato dai ruoli;

richiamati gli art. 17 cpv. 3, 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

pronuncia:

1. Il ricorso 16 novembre 2001 di __________, __________ __________ è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano spese, né si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale a Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello, in conformità dell’art. 19 LEF.

4. Intimazione a: - __________

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il vicepresidente Il segretario