Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.2001.257 • TRAC TI 15.2001.257 KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Rental Income Distribution in Bankruptcy Struck as Moot

Geschäftsnummer 15.2001.257
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An appellant challenged the special bankruptcy administration's failure to distribute CHF 33,880.95 in rental income from a property to the appellant, who was a mortgage creditor. The court found that the special administration subsequently complied with the demand, communicating that the rental income calculation had been sent and the payment had been made to the creditor. Therefore, because the complained-of delayed act had been completed, the appeal was deemed to have lost its object and was struck from the roll.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 19 LEF, art. 17 cpv. 3, 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF; Appeal Regarding Rental Income Distribution in Bankruptcy Struck as Moot: The court found that the special administration subsequently complied with the demand, communicating that the rental income calculation had been sent and the payment had been made to the creditor. Therefore, because the complained-of delayed act had been completed, the appeal was deemed to have lost its object and was struck from the roll.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Mietzinseinnahmen Konkursverwaltung Einkommenverteilung Ausweisung des Mieters Verrechnung im Konkurs Erbteilungsklage Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 19 LEF
Cited in order 3 as the provision governing the right to appeal against this decision.
art. 17 cpv. 3, 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF
These provisions, although cited in the reasoning section, are related to the substance of the proceedings, which resulted in the appeal being struck out, and their citation suggests the underlying legal framework for the action taken, but they are not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1-4.
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF
These provisions, although cited in the reasoning section, are related to the substance of the proceedings, which resulted in the appeal being struck out, and their citation suggests the underlying legal framework for the action taken, but they are not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1-4.
KI-generiert
15.1996.00096
Bankruptcy Proceeds Distribution Delay Appeal Mootness
15.2004.138
Creditor Appeal on Bankruptcy Distribution Schedule Regarding Misappropriated Rental Income
15.1995.112
Bankruptcy Asset Sale Appeal Mootness
14.2011.196
Appeal Against Bankruptcy Declaration Based on Rent Arrears

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 19 LEF

Cited in order 3 as the provision governing the right to appeal against this decision.

art. 17 cpv. 3, 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF

These provisions, although cited in the reasoning section, are related to the substance of the proceedings, which resulted in the appeal being struck out, and their citation suggests the underlying legal framework for the action taken, but they are not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1-4.

art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

These provisions, although cited in the reasoning section, are related to the substance of the proceedings, which resulted in the appeal being struck out, and their citation suggests the underlying legal framework for the action taken, but they are not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1-4.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.2001.00257 · Lugano 9 novembre 2001 /FP/fc/fb · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Cometta, presidente Pellegrini e Rusca

segretario: · Cassina, vicecancelliere

statuendo sul ricorso 10 settembre 2001 di

__________, rappr. dall'avv. __________ contro

l’operato dell’Amministrazione fallimentare speciale dell’eredità giacente

__________

e meglio contro la mancata distribuzione del ricavo della locazione dell’immobile PPP 1699, fondo base part. __________ __________, pari a fr. 33'880.95, di spettanza della creditrice ipotecaria ricorrente;

viste le osservazioni 12 settembre 2001 dell’Amministrazione fallimentare speciale;

preso atto che con scritto 24 ottobre 2001 l’Amministrazione fallimentare speciale ha comunicato di aver trasmesso alla __________ di __________ il conteggio relativo agli affitti percepiti dalla locazione della PPP __________, fondo base part. __________ __________;

che l’amministrazione fallimentare speciale ha inoltre comunicato alla Banca il versamento dell’importo di fr. 33'880.95 a titolo di canoni locatizi;

ritenuto che pertanto - l’atto ritardato essendo stato compiuto - il ricorso è da ritenere divenuto privo di oggetto e va stralciato dai ruoli;

Richiamati gli art. 17 cpv. 3, 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

Pronuncia:

1. Il ricorso 10 settembre 2001 della __________, __________, è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano spese, né si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale a Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello, in conformità dell’art. 19 LEF.

4. Intimazione a:

- __________

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente: Il segretario: