Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.2001.00043 • TRAC TI 15.2001.00043 KI-generiert

Moot Appeal in Mortgage Enforcement Procedure

Geschäftsnummer 15.2001.00043
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party filed an appeal against the final distribution schedule in a real estate mortgage enforcement procedure initiated by a creditor against the appellant. The appellate court, acting as the supervisory authority, noted that the appellant subsequently informed the court via letter that an agreement had been reached between the parties and that the appeal was withdrawn. Consequently, the court ruled that the appeal had become moot and ordered it to be struck from the records, without imposing any fees or awarding indemnity.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 20a cpv. 1 primo, Art. 19 LEF, art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF; Moot Appeal in Mortgage Enforcement Procedure: The appellate court, acting as the supervisory authority, noted that the appellant subsequently informed the court via letter that an agreement had been reached between the parties and that the appeal was withdrawn. Consequently, the court ruled that the appeal had become moot and ordered it to be struck from the records, without imposing any fees or awarding indemnity.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Grundpfandverwertung Immobilienvermögen Ausweisung aus einer Wohnung Zivilprozess nachträglicher Rechtsvorschlag Letter of Indemnity Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 20a cpv. 1 primo
richiamati gli art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, 61 cpv.
Art. 19 LEF
This article governs the possibility to appeal the decision to the Federal Supreme Court, as noted in order 3.
art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF
This article is cited in the preamble to the decision, but the dispositive order 1 simply states the appeal is struck from the roll due to withdrawal, which is a procedural outcome, not directly based on a substantive article cited in the orders.
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF
These articles are cited in the preamble but are not explicitly used in the numbered orders (dispositive) regarding the merits, procedure, or costs.
KI-generiert
15.2024.16
Appeal Moot Due to Enforcement Withdrawal
15.2023.106
Appeal Mootness in Real Estate Enforcement Procedures Following Withdrawal
15.1997.00183
Appeal against Real Estate Mortgage Enforcement Struck Due to Withdrawal
15.1997.214
Appeal Against Enforcement Procedure Rendered Moot by Settlement

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF

This article is cited in the preamble to the decision, but the dispositive order 1 simply states the appeal is struck from the roll due to withdrawal, which is a procedural outcome, not directly based on a substantive article cited in the orders.

art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

These articles are cited in the preamble but are not explicitly used in the numbered orders (dispositive) regarding the merits, procedure, or costs.

art. 19 LEF

This article governs the possibility to appeal the decision to the Federal Supreme Court, as noted in order 3.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.2001.00043 · Lugano 4 aprile 2001 /JC/fc/rgc · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Cometta, presidente, Pellegrini e Rusca

segretario: · Jaques, vicecancelliere

statuendo sul ricorso 22 febbraio 2001 di

__________, patrocinato da: avv. __________, contro

l’operato dell’Ufficio di esecuzione di Lugano, e meglio contro lo stato di riparto definitivo del 12 febbraio 2001 nella procedura di realizzazione di pegno immobiliare n. __________ promossa da:

__________, rappr. dall’avv. __________

preso atto che con lettera 22 marzo 2001 il ricorrente ha dichiarato di ritirare il ricorso per intervenuto accordo tra le parti;

considerato come il gravame sia così divenuto privo di oggetto e vada quindi stralciato dai ruoli;

richiamati gli art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF pronuncia:

1. Il ricorso 22 febbraio 2001 di __________, è stralciato dai ruoli per intervenuto ritiro.

2. Non si prelevano tasse, né si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale a Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello, in conformità dell’art. 19 LEF.

4. Intimazione a: - __________

Comunicazione all’UE di Lugano

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente Il segretario