Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.2000.68 • TRAC TI 15.2000.68 KI-generiert

Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal

Geschäftsnummer 15.2000.68
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party filed an appeal against a seizure order executed during proceedings against a debtor. The appellate court, acting as the supervisory authority, struck the appeal from the record because the appealing party, through their representative, formally withdrew the appeal before any substantive decision was made, rendering the matter moot in accordance with the relevant procedural articles.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 19 LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF, art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF; Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal: The appellate court, acting as the supervisory authority, struck the appeal from the record because the appealing party, through their representative, formally withdrew the appeal before any substantive decision was made, rendering the matter moot in accordance with the relevant procedural articles.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Reihenfolge der Pfändung Rückzug des Rechtsbegehrens Beschwerdelegitimation Pfändung verwaltungsrechtlicher Widerruf Eilvorabentscheidungsverfahren Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 19 LEF
Cited as the procedural basis for appealing the decision to the Federal Tribunal.
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF
Cited in the grounds leading to the decision to strike the appeal from the roll because the appeal became devoid of object.
art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF
Cited in the grounds leading to the decision to strike the appeal from the roll because the appeal became devoid of object.
KI-generiert
15.1999.67
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal
15.1997.56
Appeal Dismissed as Moot Due to Withdrawal
15.1998.00065
Appeal Dismissed Upon Withdrawal in Seizure Order Challenge
15.1997.108
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Seizure Order
15.1999.180
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Seizure Order

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF

Cited in the grounds leading to the decision to strike the appeal from the roll because the appeal became devoid of object.

art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

Cited in the grounds leading to the decision to strike the appeal from the roll because the appeal became devoid of object.

art. 19 LEF

Cited as the procedural basis for appealing the decision to the Federal Tribunal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.2000.00068 · Lugano 8 giugno 2000 /FA/fc/dp · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Cometta, presidente, Pellegrini e Zali

segretaria: · Baur Martinelli, vicecancelliera

statuendo sul ricorso 15 maggio 2000 di

____________________patr. dallo studio legale avv. __________ contro

contro __________ e meglio contro il verbale di sequestro 13 aprile 2000 eseguito nell'ambito della procedura avviata nei confronti di

__________

preso atto che, con scritto 25 maggio 2000 il patrocinatore di __________ ha dichiarato di ritirare il ricorso 15 maggio 2000;

ritenuto come il gravame sia divenuto privo di oggetto;

Richiamati gli art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF,

pronuncia: 1. ll ricorso 15 maggio 2000 di __________, è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano spese, né si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla

Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale a Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello, in conformità dell’art.

19 LEF.

4. Intimazione a:

- __________

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente La segretaria