Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.2000.5 • TRAC TI 15.2000.5 KI-generiert

Appeal Moot Due to Withdrawal of Underlying Claim

Geschäftsnummer 15.2000.5
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party filed an appeal concerning the actions of an enforcement office in a specific execution proceeding; however, the court noted that the creditor involved had withdrawn the underlying appeal, rendering the current appeal moot. Consequently, the supervisory authority dismissed the appeal as having lost its object according to relevant enforcement statutes and therefore struck it from the roll without imposing costs or awarding indemnities.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 20a cpv. 1 primo, Art. 19 LEF, art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF, art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF; Appeal Moot Due to Withdrawal of Underlying Claim: Consequently, the supervisory authority dismissed the appeal as having lost its object according to relevant enforcement statutes and therefore struck it from the roll without imposing costs or awarding indemnities.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Klagerückzug Vollstreckungsentscheid Ertrag Beschwerdelegitimation Gegenstandslosigkeit der Überstellung Widerspruchsklage Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 20a cpv. 1 primo
richiamati gli art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, 61 cpv.
Art. 19 LEF
Cited as the basis for appeal to the Federal Supreme Court against this decision.
art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF
This provision is implicitly the basis for handling the appeal once it became moot due to withdrawal, although the actual order only explicitly cites it in the preamble context, the structure suggests it underlies the decision to strike the case from the roll.
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF
This provision is listed among those referenced for the pronouncement, likely relating to the procedural handling of the withdrawal.
art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF
This provision is listed among those referenced for the pronouncement, likely relating to the procedural handling of the withdrawal.
KI-generiert
15.1998.56
Appeal Struck Due to Mootness Following Withdrawal of Underlying Appeal
15.1997.190
Appeal Moot Due to Enforcement Withdrawal
15.1998.48
Appeal Moot Due to Withdrawal of Enforcement Proceeding
14.2017.105
Appeal Moot Due to Withdrawal of Execution
15.2021.85
Mootness of Appeal Following Withdrawal of Enforcement Action

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF

This provision is implicitly the basis for handling the appeal once it became moot due to withdrawal, although the actual order only explicitly cites it in the preamble context, the structure suggests it underlies the decision to strike the case from the roll.

art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF

This provision is listed among those referenced for the pronouncement, likely relating to the procedural handling of the withdrawal.

art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

This provision is listed among those referenced for the pronouncement, likely relating to the procedural handling of the withdrawal.

art. 19 LEF

Cited as the basis for appeal to the Federal Supreme Court against this decision.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.2000.00005 · Lugano 28 gennaio 2000 /FP/fc/fb · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Cometta, presidente Pellegrini e Zali

segretaria: · Baur Martinelli, vicecancelliera

statuendo sul ricorso 20 gennaio 2000 di

__________

contro

l’operato dell’UEF di Locarno nell’esecuzione n. __________ promossa dalla ricorrente nei confronti di

__________

preso atto che con lettera 21 gennaio 2000 l’UEF di Locarno ha comunicato che la creditrice __________ ha ritirato il ricorso in data 20 gennaio 2000;

considerato come il gravame sia così divenuto privo di oggetto;

richiamati gli art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF;

pronuncia: 1. Il ricorso

13 gennaio 2000 __________, è stralciato dai ruoli per intervenuto ritiro.

2. Non si prelevano spese, né si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale a Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello, in conformità dell’art. 19 LEF.

4. Intimazione a:

- __________

Comunicazione all'UEF di Locarno

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

Il presidente La segretaria