Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.2000.43 • TRAC TI 15.2000.43 KI-generiert

Execution Sale of Debtor's Interest in Undivided Estate

Geschäftsnummer 15.2000.43
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A supervisory authority, acting as the appellate court's Chamber of Execution and Bankruptcy, addressed a request from the execution office to determine the method for realizing a debtor's interest in an undivided estate and community property following a debt execution. The court noted the execution office assigned a nominal value to the seized share, a conciliation attempt failed, and no proposals for realizing the seized hereditary share were submitted within the prescribed timeframe, leading the court to determine that public auction, as proposed by the office and supported by relevant execution laws and regulations concerning the seizure and realization of joint rights, was the appropriate method for selling the debtor's interest.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 132 LEF, Art. 19 LEF, art. 9 RDC, art. 10 RDC; Execution Sale of Debtor's Interest in Undivided Estate: The court noted the execution office assigned a nominal value to the seized share, a conciliation attempt failed, and no proposals for realizing the seized hereditary share were submitted within the prescribed timeframe, leading the court to determine that public auction, as proposed by the office and supported by relevant execution laws and regulations concerning the seizure and realization of joint rights, was the appropriate method for selling the debtor's interest.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
unverteilte Erbschaft Konkursmasse öffentliche Versteigerung Pfändungsvollzug öffentliches Eigentum öffentliche Schulden Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 132 LEF
This provision was cited as the basis for ordering the realization of the pledged interest through public auctions in order no. 1.
Art. 19 LEF
This provision governs the appeal procedure against this decision, as mentioned in order no. 2.
art. 9 RDC
This regulation provision was cited as a legal basis supporting the decision, though it is not the main ground for the order.
art. 10 RDC
This regulation provision was cited as a legal basis supporting the decision, though it is not the main ground for the order.
KI-generiert
15.1996.162
Execution Sale of Debtor's Estate Interest
15.2002.85
Sale of Heir's Undivided Estate Interest by Public Auction
15.1996.152
Execution Sale of Debtor's Interest in Undivided Inheritance and Marital Property
15.1996.9
Supervisory Authority Order for Public Auction of Debtor's Interest in Undivided Estate
15.2004.127
Realization of Debtor's Interest in Undivided Estate by Public Auction

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 132 LEF

This provision was cited as the basis for ordering the realization of the pledged interest through public auctions in order no. 1.

art. 9 RDC

This regulation provision was cited as a legal basis supporting the decision, though it is not the main ground for the order.

art. 10 RDC

This regulation provision was cited as a legal basis supporting the decision, though it is not the main ground for the order.

art. 19 LEF

This provision governs the appeal procedure against this decision, as mentioned in order no. 2.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.2000.00043 · Lugano 10 aprile 2000/FC/rf · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino Il presidente della Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Cometta, presidente Pellegrini e Zali

segretario: · Baur Martinelli, vicecancelliera

vista l’istanza 13 marzo 2000 dell’UE di Lugano tendente a far determinare il modo di realizzazione dell’interessenza spettante all’escussa

__________

nell’eredità indivisa ed in comunione relitta dal defunto

__________ nell'esecuzione n. __________ dell’UE di Lugano promossa da

__________, già __________, Succursale di __________ preso atto che l’UE di Lugano ha assegnato alla quota pignorata un valore di Fr. 1.--;

considerato l’esito negativo dell’esperimento di conciliazione tenutosi il 19 agosto 1998;

rilevato che, nel termine di dieci giorni fissato il 19 agosto 1998, non sono state formulate proposte sulle modalità di realizzazione della quota ereditaria pignorata;

richiamato lo scritto 25 agosto 1998 del __________;

ritenuta in queste circostanze l’opportunità di far capo ai pubblici incanti, come proposto dall’Ufficio;

visti gli art. 132 LEF; 9 e 10 del Regolamento del Tribunale federale concernente il pignoramento e la realizzazione dei diritti in comunione (RDC),

PRONUNCIA

1. È ordinata la realizzazione a mezzo di pubblici incanti dell’interessenza spettante a __________, __________, nell’eredità indivisa e in comunione relitta dal fu __________, già in __________, interessenza pignorata nell'esecuzione n. __________ dell’UE di Lugano.

2. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale, Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello, Lugano, in conformità dell'art. 19 LEF.

3. Intimazione all'UE di Lugano e, per il suo tramite, a tutti gli interessati.

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente La segretaria