Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.2000.40 • TRAC TI 15.2000.40 KI-generiert

Creditor Appeal Moot After Liquidator Dividend Payment

Geschäftsnummer 15.2000.40
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A creditor filed an appeal regarding delayed justice after a liquidator in an abandonment of assets arrangement failed to pay the concordatory dividend. Following the filing of the appeal, the liquidator deposited the distribution statement and subsequently the creditor confirmed receipt of the concordatory dividend and requested the withdrawal of the appeal. The supervisory authority, finding that the delayed act had been completed, ruled that the appeal had become moot and ordered it struck from the roll without assessing costs or awarding compensation.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 17 cpv. 3 LEF, Art. 19 LEF, art. 61 cpv.2 lett. a OTLEF, art. 62 cpv.2 OTLEF; Creditor Appeal Moot After Liquidator Dividend Payment: Following the filing of the appeal, the liquidator deposited the distribution statement and subsequently the creditor confirmed receipt of the concordatory dividend and requested the withdrawal of the appeal. The supervisory authority, finding that the delayed act had been completed, ruled that the appeal had become moot and ordered it struck from the roll without assessing costs or awarding compensation.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Zahlungsbefehl Liquidationsverfahren fehlende Aktivlegitimation des Aktionärs Insolvenzentschädigung nachträglicher Rechtsvorschlag Erbteilungsklage Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 17 cpv. 3 LEF
This article appears to be the basis for the decision to strike the appeal from the roll as the delay was rectified (though not explicitly linked to the 'stralciato dai ruoli' order, it is cited immediately before the dispositive).
Art. 19 LEF
This article is cited to establish the deadline and procedure for appealing the current decision to the Federal Supreme Court.
art. 61 cpv.2 lett. a OTLEF
This procedural rule is cited immediately before the dispositive, indicating its application to the court's decision-making process.
art. 62 cpv.2 OTLEF
This procedural rule is cited immediately before the dispositive, indicating its application to the court's decision-making process.
KI-generiert
15.1996.8
Appeal Moot Due to Subsequent Liquidator Decision
15.2021.10
Creditor Appeal Against Enforcement Office Moot Due to Debtor Payment
15.2025.114
Creditor Appeal Against Enforcement Office Dismissed as Moot After Debt Payment
15.1996.121
Estate Liquidation Delay Moot Appeal
15.2001.303
Liquidator Disciplinary Proceedings Despite Mootness of Delay Claim

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 17 cpv. 3 LEF

This article appears to be the basis for the decision to strike the appeal from the roll as the delay was rectified (though not explicitly linked to the 'stralciato dai ruoli' order, it is cited immediately before the dispositive).

art. 61 cpv.2 lett. a OTLEF

This procedural rule is cited immediately before the dispositive, indicating its application to the court's decision-making process.

art. 62 cpv.2 OTLEF

This procedural rule is cited immediately before the dispositive, indicating its application to the court's decision-making process.

art. 19 LEF

This article is cited to establish the deadline and procedure for appealing the current decision to the Federal Supreme Court.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.2000.00040 · Lugano 11 aprile 2000/FA/fc/rf · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Cometta, presidente, Pellegrini e Zali

segretario: · Baur Martinelli, vicecancelliera

statuendo sul ricorso per ritardata giustizia 22 febbraio 2000 di

__________

contro l’operato del commissario avv. __________, __________, nel concordato con abbandono dell’attivo relativo a

__________

e meglio contro il mancato versamento del dividendo concordatario;

vista la pubblicazione del FUC n. __________ di __________ con la quale il commissario ha comunicato ai creditori il deposito dello stato di riparto del concordato __________;

preso atto dello scritto 5 aprile 2000 nel quale il ricorrente comunica la ricezione del dividendo concordatario e chiede di “voler annullare il nostro ricorso inoltrato in data 22 febbraio 2000”;

ritenuto che pertanto - l’atto ritardato essendo stato compiuto - il ricorso è divenuto privo di oggetto e va stralciato dai ruoli;

Richiamati gli art.17 cpv. 3 LEF, 61 cpv.2 lett. a e 62 cpv.2 OTLEF,

pronuncia: 1. Il ricorso 22 febbraio 2000 di __________, __________, è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano spese, né si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale a Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello, in conformità dell’art. 19 LEF.

4. Intimazione a:

-__________

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente La segretaria