Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.2000.188 • TRAC TI 15.2000.188 KI-generiert

Appeal Dismissal Due to Withdrawal of Enforcement Action

Geschäftsnummer 15.2000.188
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party filed an appeal against a decision by the Execution Office regarding multiple enforcement and seizure procedures; however, the Execution Office subsequently struck the appeal from the roll because the initiating creditor had withdrawn the enforcement procedures against the relevant debtor. The appellate court, acting as the supervisory authority, determined that since the underlying matter had been resolved by the creditor's withdrawal and the initial judgment was not contested, the appeal had become devoid of object, resulting in its dismissal from the roll pursuant to relevant execution law provisions.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 19 LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF, art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF; Appeal Dismissal Due to Withdrawal of Enforcement Action: The appellate court, acting as the supervisory authority, determined that since the underlying matter had been resolved by the creditor's withdrawal and the initial judgment was not contested, the appeal had become devoid of object, resulting in its dismissal from the roll pursuant to relevant execution law provisions.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Klagerückzug Vollstreckungsentscheid Pfändungsvollzug administrative Entlassung Pfändung Widerruf des bedingten Strafvollzugs Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 19 LEF
This provision regulates the possibility and procedure for appealing the decision to the Federal Supreme Court.
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF
The provision cited in the consideration is implicitly used to determine that the appeal became moot, leading to its striking from the rolls.
art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF
The provision cited in the consideration is implicitly used to determine that the appeal became moot, leading to its striking from the rolls.
KI-generiert
15.1995.196
Appeal Dismissed Due to Withdrawal of Execution Proceedings Following Settlement
15.1999.67
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal
15.2000.142
Appeal Withdrawal Jurisdiction Dispute
15.1996.00029
Appeal Dismissed Due to Withdrawal in Execution Proceeding
15.1997.108
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Seizure Order

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF

The provision cited in the consideration is implicitly used to determine that the appeal became moot, leading to its striking from the rolls.

art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

The provision cited in the consideration is implicitly used to determine that the appeal became moot, leading to its striking from the rolls.

art. 19 LEF

This provision regulates the possibility and procedure for appealing the decision to the Federal Supreme Court.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.2000.00188 · Lugano 09 gennaio 2001 /LG/fc/dp · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Cometta, presidente, Pellegrini e Zali

segretario: · Cassina, vicecancelliere

statuendo sul ricorso 7 dicembre 2000 di

__________ rappr. dall’avv. __________ Contro

l’operato dell’Ufficio di esecuzione di Lugano e meglio contro il provvedimento 11 ottobre 2000 nell’ambito di diverse procedure esecutive e di sequestro

preso atto che con provvedimento 12 dicembre 2000 l’Ufficio di esecuzione di Lugano ha stralciato dai ruoli il ricorso avendo il creditore procedente provveduto ad annullare le procedure esecutive nei confronti di

__________ __________ rappr. dall’avv. __________

ritenuto che il pregresso giudizio, munito dell’indicazione dei mezzi di ricorso, non è stato impugnato;

considerato come il gravame sia così divenuto privo d’oggetto;

richiamati gli art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

pronuncia:

1. Il ricorso 7 dicembre 2000 di __________, è stralciato dai ruoli nel senso dei considerandi.

2. Non si prelevano spese e non si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro 10 giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale, Losanna, tramite la scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello, in conformità dell’art. 19 LEF.

4. Intimazione a: - __________

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente Il segretario