Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.2000.154 • TRAC TI 15.2000.154 KI-generiert

Appeal Moot Due to Subsequent Modification of Attachment Order

Geschäftsnummer 15.2000.154
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party appealed a notice of attachment issued by the execution office concerning two debt collection proceedings; however, the execution office subsequently reconsidered and modified its initial measure pursuant to the relevant procedural law. The appellate court determined that because the original measure, which had been properly appealed, was superseded by the reconsideration and the deadline for appealing the original measure had passed without challenge, the appeal against the original notice had become moot and must therefore be struck from the record.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 17 cpv. 4 LEF, Art. 19 LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF, art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF; Appeal Moot Due to Subsequent Modification of Attachment Order: The appellate court determined that because the original measure, which had been properly appealed, was superseded by the reconsideration and the deadline for appealing the original measure had passed without challenge, the appeal against the original notice had become moot and must therefore be struck from the record.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Arrestverfahren prozessleitende Verfügungen Wiedererwägung Inkasso Anfechtbarkeit des Rückweisungsentscheids Revision eines Entscheids Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 17 cpv. 4 LEF
Cited in the preliminary analysis as the basis for the lower authority's reconsideration which rendered the appeal moot.
Art. 19 LEF
Cited in order (3) to specify the recourse available against the present decision.
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF
Cited in the preliminary analysis regarding the decision, although the main operative part (1) refers only to the rendering mootness.
art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF
Cited in the preliminary analysis regarding the decision, although the main operative part (1) refers only to the rendering mootness.
KI-generiert
15.2000.178
Case regarding Mootness of Appeal Against Attachment Notice Modification
15.2000.4
Appeal Against Attachment Notice Struck as Moot
15.2004.55
Debtor's Appeal Against Attachment Struck as Moot Following Execution Cancellation
15.2000.179
Debtor's Appeal Against Attachment Rendered Moot by Debt Payment

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 17 cpv. 4 LEF

Cited in the preliminary analysis as the basis for the lower authority's reconsideration which rendered the appeal moot.

art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF

Cited in the preliminary analysis regarding the decision, although the main operative part (1) refers only to the rendering mootness.

art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

Cited in the preliminary analysis regarding the decision, although the main operative part (1) refers only to the rendering mootness.

art. 19 LEF

Cited in order (3) to specify the recourse available against the present decision.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.2000.00154 · Lugano 24 novembre 2000 /LG/fc/dp · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Cometta, presidente, Pellegrini e Zali

segretario: · Jaques, vicecancelliere

statuendo sul ricorso 2 novembre 2000 di

__________ contro

l’operato dell’Ufficio di esecuzione e fallimenti di Locarno, e meglio conto l’avviso di pignoramento 23 ottobre 2000 nelle esecuzioni __________ e __________ promosse contro il ricorrente da

__________ rappr. da __________

preso atto che con provvedimento 10 novembre 2000 l’UEF di Locarno ha riconsiderato il provvedimento impugnato ex art 17 cpv. 4 LEF;

ritenuto che il pregresso provvedimento, munito dell’indicazione dei mezzi di ricorso non è stato impugnato;

considerato come il gravame sia così divenuto privo di oggetto e va quindi stralciato dai ruoli;

richiamati gli art. 17 cpv. 4 LEF, 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

pronuncia:

1. Il ricorso 2 novembre 2000 __________, è stralciato dai ruoli, poiché divenuto privo di oggetto.

2. Non si prelevano spese, né si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale a Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello, in conformità dell’art. 19 LEF.

4. Intimazione a: - __________;

Comunicazione all’UEF di Locarno.

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente Il segretario