Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.2000.104 • TRAC TI 15.2000.104 KI-generiert

Appeal Dismissed as Moot Following Reconsideration of Enforcement Action

Geschäftsnummer 15.2000.104
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party filed an appeal against the actions of an enforcement office in an execution proceeding, but the appellate court dismissed the appeal as moot because the enforcement office had reconsidered its challenged decision pursuant to a specific statutory provision, and the original decision, which had stated the means of recourse, had not been appealed separately. The court reasoned that since the initial measure being contested was superseded by a subsequent, unchallenged reevaluation, the appeal regarding the prior measure lost its object and was therefore removed from the court's docket.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 17 cpv. 4 LEF, Art. 19 LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF, art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF; Appeal Dismissed as Moot Following Reconsideration of Enforcement Action: The court reasoned that since the initial measure being contested was superseded by a subsequent, unchallenged reevaluation, the appeal regarding the prior measure lost its object and was therefore removed from the court's docket.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vollstreckungsentscheid Dispositiv Wiedererwägung Anfechtbarkeit des Rückweisungsentscheids gesetzliche Grundlage Nichtigkeitsklage im Gemeinschaftsrecht Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 17 cpv. 4 LEF
This article was cited in the final orders as part of the legal basis, relating to the reconsidered measure which rendered the appeal moot.
Art. 19 LEF
Cited in the operative part (Order 3) as the legal basis for appealing the decision to the Federal Supreme Court.
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF
This article was cited in the final orders as part of the legal basis, although the operative part only enacted the outcome (striking the appeal).
art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF
This article was cited in the final orders as part of the legal basis, although the operative part only enacted the outcome (striking the appeal).
KI-generiert
15.2000.100
Appeal Struck as Moot Due to Subsequent Modification of Enforcement Action
15.2008.56
Appeal Moot Due to Subsequent Agency Reconsideration
15.2002.134
Appeal Mootness Due to Enforcement Office Reconsideration
15.1997.130
Appeal Struck as Moot Following Admitted Objection
15.2021.58
Appeal Moot Due to Successful Reconsideration by Execution Office

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF

This article was cited in the final orders as part of the legal basis, although the operative part only enacted the outcome (striking the appeal).

art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

This article was cited in the final orders as part of the legal basis, although the operative part only enacted the outcome (striking the appeal).

art. 17 cpv. 4 LEF

This article was cited in the final orders as part of the legal basis, relating to the reconsidered measure which rendered the appeal moot.

art. 19 LEF

Cited in the operative part (Order 3) as the legal basis for appealing the decision to the Federal Supreme Court.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.2000.00104 · Lugano 30 agosto 2000 /FP/fc/dp · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Cometta, presidente, Pellegrini e Zali

segretaria: · Baur Martinelli, vicecancelliera

statuendo sul ricorso 5 agosto 2000 di

__________

contro

l’operato dell’UEF di Locarno nell’ambito dell’esecuzione n. __________ promossa nei confronti del ricorrente da

__________

preso atto che con provvedimento 14 agosto 2000 l’UEF di Locarno ha riconsiderato il provvedimento impugnato ex art 17 cpv. 4 LEF;

ritenuto che il pregresso provvedimento, munito dell’indicazione dei mezzi di ricorso non è stato impugnato;

considerato come il gravame sia così divenuto privo di oggetto e va quindi stralciato dai ruoli;

richiamati gli art.

17 cpv. 4 LEF, 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

pronuncia:

1. Il ricorso 8 agosto 2000 di __________ è stralciato dai ruoli, poiché divenuto privo di oggetto.

2. Non si prelevano spese, né si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale a Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello, in conformità dell’art. 19 LEF.

4. Intimazione a: - __________

Comunicazione all’UEF di Locarno.

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente La segretaria