Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.1999.207 • TRAC TI 15.1999.207 KI-generiert

Appeal Rendered Moot by Enforcement Office Modification of Garnishment Order

Geschäftsnummer 15.1999.207
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An appeal was filed against a wage garnishment order issued by the enforcement office, which the appellate court initially granted a suspensive effect, but subsequently, the enforcement office reconsidered and modified its original measure. The court determined that because the original measure, which was the subject of the appeal, was reviewed and altered by the enforcement office before the appeal could be fully adjudicated, the appeal had become devoid of object, leading the court to strike the appeal from the rolls without imposing costs or awarding indemnities.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 17 cpv. 4 LEF, Art. 20a cpv. 1 primo, Art. 19 LEF, art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF, art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF; Appeal Rendered Moot by Enforcement Office Modification of Garnishment Order: The court determined that because the original measure, which was the subject of the appeal, was reviewed and altered by the enforcement office before the appeal could be fully adjudicated, the appeal had become devoid of object, leading the court to strike the appeal from the rolls without imposing costs or awarding indemnities.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Lohnpfändung Zulassung der Zwangsvollstreckung Rechtsvorschlag Verfahrensüberprüfung Abänderung von Kindesunterhalt Revision eines Entscheids Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 17 cpv. 4 LEF
Art. 20a cpv. 1 primo
richiamati gli art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, 61 cpv.
Art. 19 LEF
Cited in the dispositive order (3) to specify the grounds for an appeal against the current decision to the Federal Tribunal.
art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF
Cited as the legal basis in the reasoning section that leads to the procedural decision to strike the appeal from the roll because it became devoid of object.
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF
Cited as the legal basis in the reasoning section regarding the procedural outcome of the appeal.
art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF
Cited as the legal basis in the reasoning section regarding the procedural outcome of the appeal.
KI-generiert
15.2000.89
Appeal Against Wage Garnishment Rendered Moot by Modification of Order
15.2023.134
Appeal of Wage Garnishment Order Rendered Moot by Correction
15.2000.100
Appeal Struck as Moot Due to Subsequent Modification of Enforcement Action
15.2023.25
Appeal Against Salary Garnishment Deemed Moot Upon Partial Revision
15.2003.94
Debtor's Appeal Against Wage Garnishment Calculation Upheld in Part

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF

Cited as the legal basis in the reasoning section that leads to the procedural decision to strike the appeal from the roll because it became devoid of object.

art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF

Cited as the legal basis in the reasoning section regarding the procedural outcome of the appeal.

art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

Cited as the legal basis in the reasoning section regarding the procedural outcome of the appeal.

art. 19 LEF

Cited in the dispositive order (3) to specify the grounds for an appeal against the current decision to the Federal Tribunal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.1999.00207 · Lugano 2 febbraio 2000 /FP/fc/fb · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Cometta, presidente Pellegrini e Zali

segretario: · Baur Martinelli, vicecancelliera

statuendo sul ricorso 2 dicembre 1999 di

__________

patr. dall'avv. __________

contro

l’operato dell’UEF di Bellinzona e meglio contro il pignoramento di salario 22 novembre 1999

richiamata l’ordinanza presidenziale 10 dicembre 1999, con la quale al ricorso è stato concesso l’effetto sospensivo;

preso atto che con provvedimento 17 gennaio 2000 l’UEF di Bellinzona ha riconsiderato il provvedimento impugnato ex art 17 cpv. 4 LEF;

ritenuto che il pregresso provvedimento, munito dell’indicazione dei mezzi di ricorso non è stato impugnato;

considerato come il gravame sia così divenuto privo di oggetto;

richiamati gli art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

pronuncia: 1. Il ricorso

2 dicembre 1999 di __________, è stralciato dai ruoli nel senso dei considerandi.

2. Non si prelevano spese, né si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale a Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello, in conformità dell’art. 19 LEF.

4. Intimazione a:

- __________

Comunicazione all’UEF di Bellinzona

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente La segretaria