Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.1999.164 • TRAC TI 15.1999.164 KI-generiert

Appeal Struck Due to Satisfaction of Debt in Enforcement Proceedings

Geschäftsnummer 15.1999.164
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party filed an appeal against the enforcement office's conduct, seeking an order to proceed with seizure in execution proceedings against a debtor regarding two specific enforcement actions. The appellate court, acting as the supervisory authority, noted that the enforcement office subsequently informed the court that the debtor had settled the outstanding debts in both enforcement actions, rendering the appeal moot. Consequently, the court struck the appeal from the roll, determining it had lost its object pursuant to relevant articles of the Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law and its implementing ordinance.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 20a cpv. 1 primo, Art. 19 LEF, art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF, art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF; Appeal Struck Due to Satisfaction of Debt in Enforcement Proceedings: The appellate court, acting as the supervisory authority, noted that the enforcement office subsequently informed the court that the debtor had settled the outstanding debts in both enforcement actions, rendering the appeal moot. Consequently, the court struck the appeal from the roll, determining it had lost its object pursuant to relevant articles of the Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law and its implementing ordinance.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Schuldbetreibung Prozessleitung Beschwerdelegitimation Reihenfolge der Pfändung Feststellungsklage Einstellung des Konkursverfahrens Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 20a cpv. 1 primo
Richiamati gli art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, 61 cpv.
Art. 19 LEF
This article governs the right to appeal against the present decision to the Federal Supreme Court.
art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF
This provision was cited in the reasoning preceding the dispositive, but the dispositive itself does not explicitly use it to order the final decision (which is striking the appeal from the roll).
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF
This provision was cited in the reasoning preceding the dispositive, but the dispositive itself does not explicitly use it to order the final decision (which is striking the appeal from the roll).
art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF
This provision was cited in the reasoning preceding the dispositive, but the dispositive itself does not explicitly use it to order the final decision (which is striking the appeal from the roll).
KI-generiert
15.2000.179
Appeal Mootness Due to Debt Satisfaction in Enforcement Proceeding
15.2021.96
Appeal Struck for Mootness After Debt Satisfaction
15.2022.148
Creditor's Appeal Moot Due to Debt Satisfaction in Enforcement Proceedings
14.2000.17
Appeal Struck Due to Debt Satisfaction
15.2005.40
Appeal Dismissed Due to Satisfaction of Debt

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF

This provision was cited in the reasoning preceding the dispositive, but the dispositive itself does not explicitly use it to order the final decision (which is striking the appeal from the roll).

art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF

This provision was cited in the reasoning preceding the dispositive, but the dispositive itself does not explicitly use it to order the final decision (which is striking the appeal from the roll).

art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

This provision was cited in the reasoning preceding the dispositive, but the dispositive itself does not explicitly use it to order the final decision (which is striking the appeal from the roll).

art. 19 LEF

This article governs the right to appeal against the present decision to the Federal Supreme Court.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.1999.00164 · Lugano 21 gennaio 2000 /FA/fc/fb · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

Composta dei giudici: · Cometta, presidente Pellegrini e Zali

Segretario: · Baur Martinelli, vicecancelliera

statuendo sul ricorso

31 agosto 1999 di

__________

__________

rappr. dall'__________

contro

l’operato dell’UEF di Bellinzona e meglio tendente ad ottenere che sia ordinato all'ufficio di procedere al pignoramento nel gruppo di esecuzione comprendente le esecuzioni n. __________ e __________ promosse dai ricorrenti nei confronti di

__________

preso atto che con scritto 14 gennaio 2000 l'UEF di Bellinzona ha comunicato che l'escusso ha saldato le due esecuzioni in oggetto;

considerato come il gravame sia così divenuto privo d'oggetto;

Richiamati gli art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF;

pronuncia: 1. Il ricorso

31 agosto 1999 di __________ e __________ è stralciato dai ruoli.

2. Non si prelevano spese, né si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale a Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello, in conformità dell’art. 19 LEF.

4. Intimazione a:

- __________

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello

quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente La segretaria