Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
15.1999.110 • TRAC TI 15.1999.110 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of Recourse Against Enforcement Office Decision

Geschäftsnummer 15.1999.110
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Tessin (CH-TI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage keine Kosten erhoben
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An appellant filed a recourse against a decision made by an enforcement and bankruptcy office, which had initially been granted a suspensive effect by presidential ordinance. However, the appellant subsequently withdrew the filed recourse via written communication. Consequently, the court found the appeal to be devoid of object and ruled to strike the recourse from the roll, determining that no costs or indemnities should be levied, while also informing the parties and the relevant enforcement office of the decision and the possibility of further appeal to the Federal Tribunal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 20a cpv. 1 primo, Art. 19 LEF, art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF, art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF; Withdrawal of Recourse Against Enforcement Office Decision: However, the appellant subsequently withdrew the filed recourse via written communication. Consequently, the court found the appeal to be devoid of object and ruled to strike the recourse from the roll, determining that no costs or indemnities should be levied, while also informing the parties and the relevant enforcement office of the decision and the possibility of further appeal to the Federal Tribunal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vollstreckungsentscheid Entzug der aufschiebenden Wirkung Rückzug des Betreibungsbegehrens Verwirkung des Rückgriffsrechts Ausstandsbegehren Verneinung der Zuständigkeit Sentenza o decisione senza scheda

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 20a cpv. 1 primo
richiamati gli art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, 61 cpv.
Art. 19 LEF
This provision is cited in order no. 3, governing the possibility of an appeal against the current decision to the Federal Tribunal.
art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF
This provision is cited as part of the legal basis leading to the final order striking the appeal from the roll due to withdrawal.
art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF
This provision is cited as part of the legal basis leading to the final order striking the appeal from the roll due to withdrawal.
art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF
This provision is cited as part of the legal basis leading to the final order striking the appeal from the roll due to withdrawal.
KI-generiert
15.1999.00003
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Enforcement Office Auction Conditions
15.2000.148
Appeal Struck Due to Withdrawal
15.1999.65
Withdrawal of Appeal in Enforcement Proceedings
15.2023.10
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Enforcement Seizure Order
15.1999.152
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Enforcement Action

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF

This provision is cited as part of the legal basis leading to the final order striking the appeal from the roll due to withdrawal.

art. 61 cpv. 2 lett. a OTLEF

This provision is cited as part of the legal basis leading to the final order striking the appeal from the roll due to withdrawal.

art. 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF

This provision is cited as part of the legal basis leading to the final order striking the appeal from the roll due to withdrawal.

art. 19 LEF

This provision is cited in order no. 3, governing the possibility of an appeal against the current decision to the Federal Tribunal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Incarto n. 15.1999.00110 · Lugano 19 ottobre 1999 /FP/fc/fb · In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino La Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d'appello quale autorità di vigilanza

composta dei giudici: · Cometta, presidente Pellegrini e Zali

segretario: · Baur Martinelli, vicecancelliera

statuendo sul ricorso 2 luglio 1999 di

__________

patr. dall’__________

contro

l’operato dell’UEF di Bellinzona e meglio contro la decisione 30 giugno 1999 richiamata l’ordinanza presidenziale 6 luglio 1999, con la quale al ricorso è stato concesso l’effetto sospensivo;

preso atto che con scritto 15 ottobre 1999 l’avv. __________ ha ritirato il ricorso inoltrato a nome di __________;

considerato come il gravame sia così divenuto privo d’oggetto;

richiamati gli art. 20a cpv. 1 primo periodo LEF, 61 cpv. 2 lett. a e 62 cpv. 2 OTLEF pronuncia: 1. Il ricorso 2 luglio 1999 di __________, è stralciato dai ruoli per intervenuto ritiro.

2. Non si prelevano spese, né si assegnano indennità.

3. Contro questa decisione è dato ricorso entro dieci giorni alla Camera delle esecuzioni e dei fallimenti del Tribunale federale a Losanna, per il tramite della scrivente Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello, in conformità dell’art. 19 LEF.

4. Intimazione a:

- __________

Comunicazione all’UEF di Bellinzona

Per la Camera di esecuzione e fallimenti del Tribunale d’appello quale autorità di vigilanza

Il presidente La segretaria