Claimant v. Defendant (Appeal on Procedural Order)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA claimant appealed a lower court's order that denied a written justification for a claim concerning a monetary demand. The higher court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appeal was directed against a procedural order that did not definitively determine the merits of the case, and therefore, the appellate jurisdiction regarding the request for a written justification was lacking at that stage of the proceedings.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertClaimant v. Defendant (Appeal on Procedural Order): The higher court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appeal was directed against a procedural order that did not definitively determine the merits of the case, and therefore, the appellate jurisdiction regarding the request for a written justification was lacking at that stage of the proceedings.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Verfügung vom 10. März 2022 \n ZK2 2022 1 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Michelle Mettler. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Kläger und Beschwerdeführer, gegen B.________, Beklagte und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Forderung (schriftliche Begründung) |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Gerichtspräsidenten am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 13. Dezember 2021, ZEV 2021 22);-
\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: