Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
V 2020 4 • VG SZ V 2020 4 KI-generiert

Healthcare Providers v. Medical Practitioner Reimbursement Dispute

Geschäftsnummer V 2020 4
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The plaintiffs, a group of healthcare providers and related entities represented by a health insurance association, sued a medical practitioner regarding reimbursement claims for services rendered, the specifics of which are not fully detailed but appear to concern disputed medical billing or cost coverage. The court reached its decision by evaluating the specific legal basis for the reimbursement claims and the contractual or statutory obligations governing the relationship between the providers and the entity responsible for payment, ultimately concluding on the merits of the various claims brought by the collective of plaintiffs against the defendant practitioner.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Healthcare Providers v. Medical Practitioner Reimbursement Dispute: The court reached its decision by evaluating the specific legal basis for the reimbursement claims and the contractual or statutory obligations governing the relationship between the providers and the entity responsible for payment, ultimately concluding on the merits of the various claims brought by the collective of plaintiffs against the defendant practitioner.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Leistungserbringer Rückerstattungspflicht Kassenverband Versicherungsverhältnis Gesundheitsbezogene Angaben juristische Person

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
The provision governs the allocation of court costs, which was ordered in the final disposition.
KI-generiert
V 2019 2
Health Insurers v. Medical Provider (Statistical Index Reimbursement Dispute)
V 2024 1
Health Insurers v. Medical Practitioner: Premature Cost Repayment Claim
II 2023 2
Foreign Medical Treatment Reimbursement Dispute
II 2024 56
Insured Party v. Health Insurer: Foreign Medication Reimbursement
I 2019 80
Dispute Over Sickness Daily Benefits

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The provision governs the allocation of court costs, which was ordered in the final disposition.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n V 2020 4 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. März 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n

\n|\n |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin Dr.med. Daniel Burger, Vertreter Leistungserbringer Dr.rer.oec. Lukas Brunner, Vertreter Versicherer |\n

\n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A1.________, \n2. A2.________ SA, \n3. A3.________, \n4. A4.________ AG, \n5. A5.________, \n6. A6.________ SA, \n7. A7.________, \n8. A8.________ AG, \n9. A9.________ AG, \n10. A10.________ AG, \n11. A11.________ AG, \n12. A12.________ SA, \n13. A13.________ AG, \n14. A14.________, \n15. A15.________ AG, \n16. A16.________ AG, \n17. A17.________ SA, \n18. A18.________ AG, \n19. A19.________ SA, \n20. A20.________ SA, \n21. A21.________ AG, \n22. A22.________ AG, \n23. A23.________ AG, \n24. A24.________ AG, \n Kläger, alle vertreten durch santésuisse, Römerstrasse 20, 4502 Solothurn, \n diese vertreten durch RA MLaw D.________ |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. B.________, \n Beklagte, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, |\n \n\n

\n