Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
STK 2022 53 • KG SZ STK 2022 53 KI-generiert

Prosecution v. Accused: Appeal of Theft, Trespassing, and Deportation Ruling

Geschäftsnummer STK 2022 53
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal and cross-appeal against a lower court's judgment regarding theft, trespassing, and deportation of an accused individual, where the prosecution was the appellant and the accused was the cross-appellant, with a private party also involved. The court's reasoning, which followed the factual findings, is central to its determination of whether the lower court's decision on the criminal liability and the resulting deportation order should be upheld or altered based on the evidence presented during the appeal proceedings.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 428 Abs. 2 StPO, Art. 422 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 434 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO, Art. 72 Abs. 1 StGB, Art. 68 Abs. 1 StGB; Prosecution v. Accused: Appeal of Theft, Trespassing, and Deportation Ruling: The court's reasoning, which followed the factual findings, is central to its determination of whether the lower court's decision on the criminal liability and the resulting deportation order should be upheld or altered based on the evidence presented during the appeal proceedings.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Diebstahls Strafverfolgung Ausländerrechtsverletzung Abschiebung rechtswidrige Ausreise Anfechtbarkeit des Rückweisungsentscheids Diebstahl, Hausfriedensbruch | Strafgesetzbuch

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO
Used to reject the appeal by the Public Prosecutor's Office for lack of standing to appeal regarding the acquittal on the charge of theft.
Art. 428 Abs. 2 StPO
Used to reject the subsidiary appeal filed by the accused regarding the sentence for culpable remaining in the country.
Art. 422 Abs. 1 StPO
Used to reject the appeal filed by the accused regarding the acquittal on the charge of theft.
Art. 434 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO
Used to dismiss the appeal by the Public Prosecutor's Office as inadmissible because it challenged an acquittal of a serious offense.
Art. 72 Abs. 1 StGB
Used to confirm the conditional deportation order against the accused.
Art. 68 Abs. 1 StGB
Used to confirm the fine imposed on the accused for culpable remaining in the country.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO
Used to allocate the costs of the appeal proceedings.
KI-generiert
STK 2020 34
Prosecutor's Appeal on Theft, Trespassing, Damage, and Deportation
STK 2022 40
Defendant Theft Conviction Appeal and Prosecution Cross-Appeal on Sentencing and Deportation
STK 2020 35
Public Prosecutor v. Accused (Theft, Trespass, Property Damage, Deportation Appeal)
STK 2025 1
Appeal Regarding Attempted Theft, Trespassing, Property Damage, and Deportation Order Revocation
STK 2019 76
Appeal of Theft, Trespassing, and Traffic Convictions with Partially Overturned Deportation Order

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to reject the appeal by the Public Prosecutor's Office for lack of standing to appeal regarding the acquittal on the charge of theft.

Art. 428 Abs. 2 StPO

Used to reject the subsidiary appeal filed by the accused regarding the sentence for culpable remaining in the country.

Art. 422 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to reject the appeal filed by the accused regarding the acquittal on the charge of theft.

Art. 434 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO

Used to dismiss the appeal by the Public Prosecutor's Office as inadmissible because it challenged an acquittal of a serious offense.

Art. 72 Abs. 1 StGB

Used to confirm the conditional deportation order against the accused.

Art. 68 Abs. 1 StGB

Used to confirm the fine imposed on the accused for culpable remaining in the country.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to allocate the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 18. April 2023 \n STK 2022 53 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Bettina Krienbühl, Dr. Stephan Zurfluh und Pius Schuler, Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Patrick Neidhart. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde, Berufungsführerin und Anschlussberufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt A.________, gegen 1. B.________, Beschuldigter, Berufungsgegner und Anschlussberufungsführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________ GmbH, Privatklägerin, Berufungsgegnerin und Anschlussberufungsgegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Diebstahl, Hausfriedensbruch, Landesverweisung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung und Anschlussberufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Schwyz vom 15. Juni 2022, SGO 2022 4);- \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: