Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
STK 2016 27 • KG SZ STK 2016 27 KI-generiert

State v. [Appellant Name] (Theft Conviction Affirmation)

Geschäftsnummer STK 2016 27
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellate court reviewed a conviction for theft where the accused appealed the verdict. The initial conviction was based on circumstantial evidence suggesting the appellant was the perpetrator of the theft. The court, in upholding the conviction, reasoned that the totality of the circumstantial evidence presented in the record was sufficient to establish the appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, thereby affirming the judgment of the lower court.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

State v. [Appellant Name] (Theft Conviction Affirmation): The initial conviction was based on circumstantial evidence suggesting the appellant was the perpetrator of the theft. The court, in upholding the conviction, reasoned that the totality of the circumstantial evidence presented in the record was sufficient to establish the appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, thereby affirming the judgment of the lower court.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Indiz Diebstahls Schuldschein Festsetzung der Busse Urkundenfälschungsverfahren Art der Zuwiderhandlung Diebstahl (Art. 139 Ziff. 1 StGB); 2. Rechtsgang | Strafgesetzbuch
KI-generiert
STK 2018 17
Defendant v. State: Affirmation of Fraud and Forgery Conviction
STK 2018 50
Appellant v. State: Appeal Against Theft and Trespassing Conviction
STK 2022 56
Theft and Fraud Conviction Upheld on Appeal
STK 2023 53
Theft, Damage, and Trespassing Conviction Upheld on Appeal Despite Partial Remand of Civil Claims
STK 2019 41
Appeal of Embezzlement Conviction Upheld

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 13. Dezember 2016 \n STK 2016 27 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl, Dr. Stephan Zurfluh und Pius Schuler, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, \n erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n betreffend · \n Diebstahl (