Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2025 53 • VG SZ III 2025 53 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Increased Development Density Approval

Geschäftsnummer III 2025 53
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves an appeal against decisions by lower administrative bodies concerning a development plan adjustment that significantly increased the buildable area on a property, which the appellant argued infringed upon their property rights and violated procedural rules, particularly regarding public consultation and the assessment of environmental impacts. The court reasoned that the lower administrative bodies had correctly interpreted the relevant planning laws concerning density allowances and that the procedural requirements, including the degree of public participation and the environmental review, met the necessary legal standards, thereby dismissing the appeal as unfounded.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Increased Development Density Approval: The court reasoned that the lower administrative bodies had correctly interpreted the relevant planning laws concerning density allowances and that the procedural requirements, including the degree of public participation and the environmental review, met the necessary legal standards, thereby dismissing the appeal as unfounded.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Plangenehmigung Bauträger Prozessvoraussetzung Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung Grundstücksnutzung Entwicklungsrecht Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited in the final order to regulate the distribution of court costs.
KI-generiert
III 2016 108
Appeal Against Development Plan Approval Quashed Due to Excessive Zoning Deviation
III 2023 5
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning Approval of Commercial Development
III 2018 9
Appeal Against Planning Approval Decision
III 2020 91
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning and Land Use Decisions
III 2020 110
Appeal Regarding Denial of Building Permit Due to Non-Compliance with Spatial Planning Regulations

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited in the final order to regulate the distribution of court costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2025 53 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Oktober 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, \n Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n