Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2025 113 • VG SZ III 2025 113 KI-generiert

Challenge to Road Usage Plan Designation

Geschäftsnummer III 2025 113
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party challenged a local council's decision and a subsequent cantonal government's decision concerning a road usage plan (Wegrodelplan for District 4), which affects access rights for vehicles on a specific path. The court reasoned that the administrative act detailing the path's designation for non-vehicular use, which was the subject of the appeal, was issued in accordance with established public law procedures, concluding that the complaints regarding procedural errors and the substance of the road designation were unfounded, thus affirming the lower administrative decisions.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Challenge to Road Usage Plan Designation: The court reasoned that the administrative act detailing the path's designation for non-vehicular use, which was the subject of the appeal, was issued in accordance with established public law procedures, concluding that the complaints regarding procedural errors and the substance of the road designation were unfounded, thus affirming the lower administrative decisions.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Zufahrtsstrasse Verwendungsrecht bürgernahe Justiz Anfechtung von Verwaltungsverfügungen Gemeindeverwaltung Strassenplan Strassenwesen (Wegrodel; Wegrodelplan Kreis 4) | Verschiedenes
KI-generiert
III 2023 47
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Service Road Designation
III 2018 126
Road Contribution Classification and Infrastructure Scope Appeal
III 2020 203
Challenge to Planning Decision Admissibility
III 2022 46
Corporate Road Access Dispute Against District and Cantonal Authorities
III 2022 158
Land Use Designation Appeal Affirmed

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2025 113 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. August 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Gemeinderat Unteriberg, Waagtalstrasse 27, Postfach 46, 8842 Unteriberg, 2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenwesen (Wegrodel; Wegrodelplan Kreis 4) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: