Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2024 86 • VG SZ III 2024 86 KI-generiert

Prisoner Sentence Execution Regime Appeal

Geschäftsnummer III 2024 86
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A person currently incarcerated filed an appeal against the decision of the prison authority concerning the execution of their sentence. The core issue involved the proper application of rules governing the penitentiary regime, specifically regarding the individual's legal status or conditions during imprisonment. The court ultimately upheld the decision of the lower authority, reasoning that the established procedures and legal framework for the execution of the sentence were correctly applied by the prison administration in determining the appellant's circumstances.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Prisoner Sentence Execution Regime Appeal: The core issue involved the proper application of rules governing the penitentiary regime, specifically regarding the individual's legal status or conditions during imprisonment. The court ultimately upheld the decision of the lower authority, reasoning that the established procedures and legal framework for the execution of the sentence were correctly applied by the prison administration in determining the appellant's circumstances.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Gefangener Strafaufschub Überprüfung der Strafzumessung Rechte der inhaftierten Person Rahmenbeschluss Zwangsverwaltung Strafvollzug (Vollzugsauftrag für Strafen) | Strafvollzug
KI-generiert
BEK 2019 113
Appeal Against Definitive Execution Authorization Between Municipalities
III 2022 108
Appeal Dismissed Against Execution of Substitute Prison Sentence for Unpaid Fines
III 2019 18
Petitioner's Consent to Sentence Execution Bars Appeal
STK 2023 32
Suspended Sentence Revocation Appeal and Probation Extension
BEK 2023 67
Appeal Against Detention Upheld Due to Inadmissibility

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2024 86 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. Juli 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Thomas Rentsch, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n z.Zt. im Strafvollzug, B.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Amt für Justizvollzug, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg SSB, \n Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, \n Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n